I hold as irrefutable that the flaw that broke this archetypal form is/was
 This
despair was well outlined in what Archibald Cox defined as Civil Disobedience, (Black's 7th 1991) - “ Social protest and even civil disobedience serve the law's need for growth” . The
rule of law is a living tree that can only survive on the creation
and maintenance of positive law, The Charter cannot be
this living tree, when this archetypal form is just an instrument
of growth.
 “Short
of the millennium, sharp changes
in the law depend partly upon the stimulus
of protest”.
-
Removing the onus from maintain positive law results in rapid
growth or sharp changes in the law And it's all rooted to abandoning
the trust of never using humans as collateral for money.
-
Civil disobedience was enacted to confront the Millennium,
and
the sabotage of our Charter of Rights and Freedoms is an instrument
to achieve this end. (quote: the Charter was not enacted
in a vacuum)
I believe THAT: Archibald Cox outlined the Hope that under-wrote the civil disobedience of converting the precious standard in the opening paragraph of: Civil Rights, the Constitution, and the Courts (Ps: Written after Nixon committed treachery, by the prosecutor who impeached Nixon)  One
cost we pay for all civil disobedience is the heavy damage it
does to the principle of government by consent of the governed
- a principle which is the surest guarantee of individual liberty
devised by man and also the source of the wildest opportunities
men have ever enjoyed to remake society without repeated violence
in contests for physical and economic power. The last page of this legal paper explains the reasoning and  ends
with a clear expression of Hope
- " Possibly there are a few rare occasions on which the goal would be so important as to outweigh the price, which a challenge to the rule of law extracts from a community. The argument is probably strongest where one refuses to do what he believes is a direct moral wrong to others  In
a case where a man is willing to repair the damage to the process
of constitutionalism, in order to guarantee liberty,
and a chance of repeated change without force, by imposing his
views upon society, then this man must be,- peculiarly self-confident
or extremely shortsighted
Past generations have made a mess of things, ours no less then our fathers.The hope of mankind is always that a new generation may begin to make a new world quickly. 
In
ORDER to maintain EQUITY in law,
the solution of Hope was also caste in the Charter, in s 11 (d): Right to a fair hearing: Trial by independent tribunal- (Martin's Law) (First criteria) Generally speaking, where the alleged contemptuous language or actions are insulting and insolent it is preferable that the matter be taken before a judge other than the judge to whom the judge to whom the remarks were addressed. (r v Martin 1985) Under this ruling there is literally no judge in Canada that can review my proceedings,  On
the solid ground THAT: this insult charges the BAR,
with FAILURE OF AN ENTITY TO COMPLY under the Police Act, and
this ENTITY faces Criminal Breach of Trust- s-336 CCC(Quote)
To meet the requirement of independence a tribunal must meet
3 essential conditions, namely: Security of tenure, financial
security, & institutional independence with respect
to matters of administration
 My contention is THAT: Under this tribunal process, and under a new perverted definition of colore officii, (threat of economic duress, which includes a contract [app#1], this tribunal was enacted in order, because the Nature of the matter of turning the people to slaves under default judgment is so insulting to any judge  The
courts sided with this factor of financial security, by
recognizing that the Banks must demand institutional independence
with respect to matters of administration, under this new
Section-7 (quote) “that infringes (all) the three rights enshrined therein…(life, liberty, and security of person).- To discover the scope of this protection one can consult with the 'standards of works; on administrative law, which flow from the new natural justice that is applicable to purely administration functions.“ (p-375 of the 2nd edition of our Charter 1989) 
Under respondeat superior,Prime
Minister Brian Mulroney is where the buck stops, in Canada, and
That TREACHERY is an international crime,
and under this case law there is a similar file
Ps: the crime of treachery is collusion with the treasury,
to change the rule of lawNapoleon, also committed the same crime of treachery, for creating Napoleonic law Loi Civil
Short of the millennium, sharp changes in the law depend
partly upon the stimulus of protest. These
elitists actually think they will win regardless of the cost
of protest, just like Napoleon’s war did: loosing
at Waterloo was irrelevant, because Loi Civil is still the rule
of law of Europe -
MILLENIUM: (introduced in Black's 7th,) A time of great social and political upheaval The son's of the same elitist bastards are doing it again “
The hope of mankind is always that a new generationmay begin to make a new world quickly“ The
key to fix this whole mess lies in: “The
principle of government by consent of the governed 'a principle
which is the surest guarantee of individual liberty devised
by man and also the source of the wildest opportunities men
have ever enjoyed to remake society without repeated violence
in contests for physical and economic power" ”
(Ps: I've done my best to do exactly this) I
come with a message of Hope: it compels me to strive for the ideal
Ideally, reform would come according to reason and justice without self-help and disturbing, almost violent, forms of protest …. Still, candor compels one here and again to acknowledge the gap between the ideal and the reality |
removing
gold and precious metals as the trust for money, and the solution
must be to abolish the usurping of life to back money.