February 27th, 2007
FILED IN: THE COURT OF APPEALS file: # CA33602
RE: NOTICE OF UNDERSTANDING TO APPEAR BEFORE A JUSTICE
- with prejudice without frivolous or vexatious intent under British common law jurisdiction, loi du jour
TO RECOGNIZE AND ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING MATTERS, AT THIS APPEARANCE
- As it is appears self-evident that this new matter is pertinent to the issues before the courts
S.D.G. - NOTICE OF UNDERSTANDING WITH CANADA POST
Here is a scanned copy of my receipt to prove that Marc Boyer holds a valid claim to be the one who shipped this parcel # 0384 3211 0011 5143 through Canada Post 3-day Priority Post delivery. This parcel was written in my own handwriting, and I paid extra to have this parcel signed off
Return address was: PMP Quadra Headquarters (Parti Marijuana Party)
(official EDA address) C/o Marc Boyer 721 E14th Ave. Vancouver BC
Shipping Address: PMP Nunavuk, Box 1019 Iqaluit NU X0A
As to Canada Post’s website indicates: This parcel is still in Richmond,
This means the parcel has been stolen, or some unaccountable authority has confiscated it. My suspicion is the latter, due to the contents of the parcel.
This parcel contains one pound of quality medical grade cannabis
As to attached documentation: As to related matter being presented at my March 7th, 2007 Court of Appeals Appearance, @ 800 Smithe St Van;
- in the Reasons for Sentence of case file #157479, it clearly outlines that:
I hold a valid political claim of right to control the buying possession and selling of cannabis under the rubric of the Parti Marijuana Party
Even though it seems that this lower court upholds that it’s a mistake to believe the Election Act stands under or upholds God’s rule of law
We claim the right to hold control and to distribute this substance under a political party’s guarantee ‘to protect beliefs the majority considers wrong or false, in order to preclude the arbitrary use of power’, (or in other words):
Stand under our founding principle of the Supremacy of God’s rule of law.
It seem apparent that Canada Post wants to interfere with this right by forwarding this parcel to police officers, who gladly took it, who have no intention of ever placing charges for trespassing on the Crown’s domain;
- Therefore you’re liable of contributing to the arbitrary use of power, and criminally and civilly liable for failure of an entity to comply with your specific mandate, which is to deliver the Queen’s mail, under Sec 337 CCC
Under this recognized rubric, of my Electoral District Association (EDA):
- I demand ‘Canada Post’ to deliver our cannabis to another EDA, because Constitutionally, under the jurisdiction of our rubric; it is your fiduciary trust (duty) to protect any political Party’s right to deliver our mail.
- This means that: when Canada Post forwarded this parcel to police without accountability to whether charges are pressed or not for this delivery, makes you liable of committing a Sec 337 CCC violation.
- In the event that Canada Post disagrees with this position, they are invited to do so and appear at this court date and present a defense against being liable of violating Sec 337 CCC, for refusing to ship our Party’s mail
NOTICE OF INTENT: If police think they can rob me, under an excuse of ‘being under investigation’, then they better explain the Constitutionality, (quasi-legal jurisdiction) for this perversion of the law.
- Nonfeasance means compliance. In the event that anyone at Canada Post or our ‘unaccountable police’ don’t appear, I will seek a ‘default judgment’ on your criminal behavior, at this court date.
Romans 13: Everyone must submit, for there is no authority except that which God has established. So be it |