This challenge to the Act of Supremacy 1559 [the Act]
holds the promise of Peace on Earth. As a pre-amble to this presentation: It must be noted that the Act of Supremacy of 1559 is the grand daddy of all grand-father clauses, & the faster it becomes common knowledge means that the greater the number of people who file a challenge to this Act, will simply accelerate the opening of a Pandora's Box of possibilities & all of them lead to greater freedom, & less authority to Constitutionally abuse power against its citizens,  
Furthermore, I'm convinced that by just revealing this Achilles' heal will be the fulfilling of a Peaceful way to fulfill the prophecy & old lore of our Golden Age , This occurs by filing a Petition thru Civil Court to seek remedy, under the Act &
this is best achieved if the BAR initiated a Petition to challenge 'the Act'

In so far as my application to Challenge the Act: 
Due to the fact that I've been setting the BAR up for a big fall I'm challenging the Act from so many directions that it can only be the fulfilling the intent of this Act.
- This is a promise contained in a Canada's well-defined rule of law & this gives Canada a unique status. The rule of law of England & in the USA is in law called 'UNDEFINED' . AND as far as the Art of War says: "you cannot defend what cannot be defined"
Their rule of law is a evolving NOTION based on case law precedent
IN CANADA - The foundation for this well defined rule of law was THAT:
It sets the BAR to reach for excellence by setting the BAR to something better than what we had. as opposed to relying on case law precedent [looking backwards] to establish law

The intend of having a well-defined rule of law is a necessary Element for casting off the old and it is a Treasure that John Locke and Blackstone established as a rock in our form
They hoped it would lead to the return to a better form of normative order & civilized life, [which was taken away], & this return would be called Manifest Destiny - Locke 's the 1 who abolished slavery in the Commonwealth [1712] - He wrote the principles of fundamental Justice & then wrote the book on how to break it [Two Treaties] He did this screw-up in the hope of manifesting God's Destiny.

Every great philosopher ever since has predicted the demise of the form because it's intent is to do exactly that: Manifest Destiny has been converted into a dirty word by Albert Pike & Horace Greely after the American unCIVIL WAR This man called himself Lucifer & he instituted the policy that no man is born free into the USA form.

This is what Thomas Jefferson warned as a "departure of principle"
“A departure from principle in one instance becomes a precedent for a second, that second for a third, and so on ‘til the bulk of society is reduced to be mere automatons of misery, to have no sensibilities left but for sinning and suffering… And the forehorse of this frightful team is public debt. Taxation follows that, and in its train wretchedness and oppression."
AND this very pertinent jab: Information is the currency of Democracy

This [so-called] evolution into our present corrupt form came from looking in the rear view mirror of BAD case law precedent & it really cannot evolve [be fixed] without a rebellion. The archetypal form was rigged to fail from the onset. It's supposed to implode in an orderly form when pressed with this mythical message of righteousness.that changes everything
I hold a legitimate claim to be delivering this message. The only way to do this in an orderly manner is with a Sec 11 D Charter Challenge thru a tribunal

BUT when you get right down to it We are in this present mess because of the Act of Supremacy of 1559 & they did it to get back to civilized life & this notion ancient called normative order

In fairness, it must be noted that: what the Act of Supremacy replaced is the order where the Pope was Supreme & infallible over even Kings, & that this power was being so thoroughly abused that it forced every Christian [& pagan Nations for the matter] to rise against the Church's abuse of power
This is where the age old expression of "power corrupts, but absolute power corrupts absolutely" came from

My contention is that returning to civilized life, is the very intent of Canada's Charter of Rights of 1976 This can arguably be called the best of all platforms for returning society to civilized life & normative order, which legally means: going to civil court 1st, where we can defend their Charter Rights 1st thru civil remedy, & the civil liability is addressed before any assumption of criminal guilt
The Charter understands our well-defined rule of law in Sec133 THAT it's an Instrument of law to recognize a wide variety of beliefs. This 're'form should be filed by an AG. AND the AG refuses to see me, so maybe someone can send him an SOS for me.

Now, to explain this in an easy to understand way: 
What I'm proposing is that Canada has seriously wandered from the founding principles of Canada & the Charter in 1982. Within 20 years of The Meech lake Accord the form is broken We need to accept that by falling back to the archetypal form of England, we can fix our bad archetypal form. In many ways it's a superior form to our Canadian form, but instead of being accountable to the Queen, [which is not the case now]
We would be accountable to preserve our rights under the Charter

4000 years ago, I Chin called this: lending a creative idea, to improve an existing archetypal form. AND there really is no more creative an idea than to change the Act of Supremacy from upholding God to upholding God's Creation
CORPORATIONS would start serving humanity, because the employees who take an oath must uphold God's Creations

Everything would change, IN FACT all laws would change without having to re-write one of them because the ground motives [intent] for all law would change from going from one everything to the other everything.
By going from upholding everything Spiritual [God] to upholding everything substantive [the Creation] we would be getting real & everything would change back to civilized life, & real normative order would be restored
IN FACT: This Act of Supremacy Challenge would make oath holders have to start swearing to an oath of allegiance. [another abnormality] Our enlightened politicians left the 1931 Colonial Act intact [big mistake] Since 1982 when we patriated our Constitution nobody swears an oath of allegiance to anything AND then
- Since 1998 no one swears to God in any oath - Canadian elected or Public Officials are not legally bonded to uphold Canada let alone it's citizens or any Constitutional rights of any of its citizens

No country in the world has done this; It's an experiment with insanity literally [Sec 16 CCC - LEGAL INSANITY [defined as] omitting the obvious & failing to see the harm created by omitting the obvious. - It means that no elected Official or Public Servant is held to uphold the best interests of Canada & frankly with the wholesale abandoning of our Sovereignty & natural resources since then, would make the average citizen believe that Authority did it on purpose to sell us out, to the USA.
It's unconstitutional to sell us out for direct cash brides. So these bastards gave us away for nothing

To outline the historical overview of civilized life under Papal rule.
It's an easy argument to accept why no one wanted to be dragged in a courtroom where a merciless Bishop would hand down judgment under the ten Commandments, & the 120+ sins of Deuteronomy & [it made people beg for indulgences]. Under the Bible it was expected that people would break these laws
[NOW there's 3000+ rules & regulations & all of them are enforced]
To put it bluntly, it's easy to defend that this order was the probable cause of the dark ages of Europe, because the dark ages simply ended with the Act of Supremacy. It created a METANOIA

Abandoning Papal rule with King Henry VIII'th rule
under the Supremacy Act of 1534 was a very bad idea BECAUSE it changed the status of a Pope being infallible to a King being infallible, & this absolute monarchy system only lasted until 1559,
This bad idea created CHAOS [just like it will create again] & it was entrenched in 1539 in the Indian Tea Company and Hudson's Bay Company being Chartered AND it never recognized the Supremacy of God in 1559
This is why the Commonwealth is pink, [on a map] because the land was not put in the Pope's registry AND it can be arguably shown that in 1982 Canada reverted back to a form that is very close to King Henry's despotism [which only lasted 35 yrs] Except it's now BANKSTER RULE

NOW we are dragged in front of a judge who upholds the ECONOMY as Supreme.
It's Reaganomics on steroids AND it was introduced by President Reagan & made into law with a rigged vote in Canada for NAFTA, under our enlightened leader:
Brian Mulroney. Ever since then, Canada the USA & Mexico are bound to international obligation [not agreement] Everyone is subject to de facto law courts that enforce a new world order under respondeat superior
- BY THE PEOPLE FOR THE ECONOMY AND
it was done just like Hitler's banksters' did it: Thru an addiction to pervert words: Lexicography really is the Smoking Gun to the downfall of Democracy

This LEGAL FORM of the USA Canada & Mexico are being over-ruled
- just like when Hitler's Generals ruled France: [& it's legal under Sec 15 CC]
- Except this time it means If a bankster or any Corporation thinks it will be harmed by a court ruling, then [this faceless dead-thing called] the ECONOMY can tell the Attorney General to go tell a Judge to harmonize it, by convicting an otherwise innocent man 'under a perverted color of Office'
-It simply cannot succeed because it's based on the notion that "No man is born Free"

The solution is to return to law and order - by redressing the granddaddy of all Laws: Queen Elizabeth 1st' Act of Supremacy of 1559 because it can arguably be called the best legal system around, because it has adapted to the colour of each nation, in its own case law. AND By redressing this Act, ANYWHERE it would obligated the rest of the world to comply

The primary reason for going back to Her Act of Supremacy, is THAT you really have to go back that far to get to where "all laws rules && regulations apply to everyone, Even Her Majesty as well"
- This time we could address the fact that BANKSTERS cannot consider themselves to be a BODY that is outside the law, as opposed to being some one subject to the law of the land [AKA perle gem terra - Magna Carta]

This Act of Supremacy was trashed in 1982 in Canada in a backroom deal made at the Meech Lake Accord - We uphold the Supremacy of Parliament since then AND some really draconian powers under Sec 33 of the Charter.
'The notwithstanding clause' IN ORDER to not get distracted from a hornet's nest of it own Click here for an information on what can only be called an Illuminate Conspiracy. Back in '82 no one was looking for the symbols of this occult society

AND in this new form, the Prime Minister is now a 'natural person'
Just like King Henry 8th and he has appointed himself to be [outside] or commonly called above the law because no laws rules or regulations apply to him [while being the Supreme Elected leader of Parliament]
It really is going back in time to a really bad idea, to see if it works
In order to avoid getting side-tracked on an other issue
Here's a link to more on this subject. [it shows how deep it is]

My contention is that nothing less than having civilized life be a part of our structure, - [as opposed to apart from our structure] - is the only measure that will prevent the wrongdoing of R v Big M Drug Mart 1985 from reoccurring, where the total abandonment of the principle of fundamental Justice was disguised under the pretense of abandoning the Lord's Day Act, which occurred at the same time as a totally unconstitutional 1985 Bank Act,
This happened so that Prime Minister Brian Mulroney could convert everyone into WAREHOUSE RECEIPTS, Which is when Canada officially entered a State where - NO MAN IS BORN FREE which is a total abomination in a Higher Order

Now, my contention is that, any Attorney General would who was seized with this matter, would have to act & he would be obligated to forward this matter as a Petition to a tribunal, [especially with the powers that the courts have vested]
NOW Since April 2005 because I want to do this, the courts have prohibited me from filing documents with the Chief Justice's Office & then my member of Parliament's Office, then at the Attorney General's Office & now every court in British Columbia & any employee of the AG
NO BODY WILL ADDRESS THE CHALLENGE & it's because I'm filing it

What is relevant to this Article is that: All of this liability started with my IDENTITY ISSUE No body wants to address my IDENTITY ISSUE, which is totally screwed up & until it's fixed I don't hold a PERSON - I can press initiatives like this & this Justice really has no option but to recognize them as relevant. BECAUSE
I really do hold title to being a Free-man because of these California water-markings on my screwed up Birth Statement that make me probably the only real Freeman in the USA since the Civil War & the last Free man of the British Empire because I was born 1 month before K. George VI died [my birth # really is 000 665]
They can't accept me because NO MAN IS BORN FREE
AND: they simply REFUSE to treat me like a human being [or any one else either]

By Challenging the Act of Supremacy, I could initiate what I consider a superior archetypal form, and if they don't like it, they can dismiss it.  But, they have to defend this in a written decision. So instead they bloke me from pressing a Charter Challenge. AND In old English law it was called 'destroying an individual'
My contention is that: If we were to merge the order upheld in England under King George VI's registry [which is my registry], with our Charter that we could create what Archibald Cox called in 1967 the wildest opportunity devised by man to remake society without the use of physical and economic force BECAUSE: Queen Elizabeth's registry is so perverted that it's beyond repair.

2] To further my Act of Supremacy Challenge - It's irrefutable that:
- I was handed a ruling in BC Appeals Court in 2007 that proves my 1st trial was rigged . I sought a lawful remedy to my identity issue with the Chief Justice.& they refused to fix it let alone address the constitutional issues at play. 
AND THEN - I was blocked from filing in the Supreme Court of Canada
- I am the first to admit that my IDENTITY ISSUE is to say the least presents what Archibald Cox called at the conclusion of this Epic paper : Possibly there are a few rare occasions on which this goal would be so important & so plainly right as to outweigh the price which a challenge to the rule of law exacts from the community. I know of none today.

The argument is probably strongest where one refuses to do what he believes is a direct moral wrong to others. In all other cases, it would seem to me that the man who is willing to 'restore' the processes of constitutionalism, which guarantee liberty and the chance of repeated change without force, in order to impose his views upon society, must be either particularly self-confident or extremely shortsighted.

Past generations have made a mess of things, ours no less than our fathers’. The hope of mankind is always that a new generation may begin to make the world over quickly. - The wrong, in the simplest terms, is the damage to the foundation upon which rests the best, if not the only real, opportunity for the making-over.
IF we don't uphold God's Creation means we really are Hell bent on destroying it
AND if you can't see that this offer for a make-over is real - then you're 'hopeless'

3] To further my Act of Supremacy Challenge of 1559
The Act is the foundation of all Barristers Solicitors oaths, where all Public Officials swear or affirm to uphold their allegiance to the Queen with God as Supreme [not the Church] & no one is above the law, not even a Monarch. - I'm challenging that the Canadian BAR abandoned this oath in 1993, & my new oath needs to be 'the fix' The new oath makes slavery OK
[it's called quasi-legal]
My contention is that upholding Creation is an expression that cannot be found in the Bible. But to say that the only reason that such a simple & true notion could not be in the Bible is because if it's the METANOIA
Then for this to be this mythical "Truth that sets us Free" means it could not even be common knowledge, until revealed, AND this is exactly the case
What is hard to dispute that it's the answer to so many Biblical riddles THAT:
The challenge really can't be ignored

Frankly, I can't see how any Chief Justice or AG can ignore that:
This notion of upholding God's Creation is the METANOIA [total about face in how we think] especially when this notion literally redefines what everything is & in this way everything changes

The Creation is and always was "everything substantive",
and that by converting  to upholding Creation makes so much sense, let alone that it offers a really powerful solution to the biggest problem of our times    [But then] If this was the only issue before Authority then I would have to agree that this initiative could be ruled as frivolous and vexatious to the order of 'things', but
it's just one more element of a very compelling argument that this really holds the metanoia & the new Covenant of Jeremiah 31.
- it's etched in your heart & written in your mind

4] To further my Act of Supremacy Challenge: 
It is also important to note that this Act upholds the principle of the Supremacy of God, & England's concept of God was entirely based on the trust to that slavery would never return,
AND this is important to Canada, because it can be found in the 1st line of our 1867 Constitution, & again it's importance can be confirmed when it was enshrined as the 1st line of our Charter of Rights and Freedoms; in 1976 AND after The Meech Lake Accord - it became just a pre-amble to the Charter [outside the Charter] It's a formal Declaration to the founding principle of Canada that says
Canada is founded on the principle of the Supremacy of God and the rule of law
- BUT since NAFTA - we are part of a new Hudson Company that has its Charter in 1539, therefore can & does legally make everyone in North America into a slave

Now imagine:  With this Charter Challenge to the Act of Supremacy,
The Supreme Court of Canada & Parliament must rule on & recognize that if we convert the oaths from upholding God to upholding Creation, then it's only logical that this court would have to address the fact that our founding principle of upholding God would have to be converted to upholding the principle of the Supremacy of God's Creation & have to declare that
This actually strengthens the courts need to uphold the principles of fundamental Justice, or in other words It totally destroys the policy of
"no man is born Free"
My contention is that the 're'form that was created by the paper Queen's of Elizabeth, in 1952, might have lasted longer than King Henry 8th's despotism. 
But the courts must recognize is that this Democratic Parliamentary System which has evolved, since the creation of these paper Queens, has degenerated itself into 'something' [not-some-one] far worse than having to deal with one tyrant King, which is exactly what my IDENTITY ISSUE & Charter Challenge offers this court an opportunity to redress. If the courts decide to do it is a totally different matter.

What I'm really trying to trigger holds the promise to fulfill the prophecy of Isaiah it says there never make me leader of people
This Hope is etched in stone in the UNITED NATIONS entrance
Isaiah 1:4 They will beat their swords into plowshares and their spears into pruning hooks. Nation will not take up sword against nation, nor will they train for war anymore

This entire Challenge could not have happened if it wasn't for the total abuse of 'no one is above the rule of law' to where every body in Authority is outside the law; [outlaws] Any elected Cabinet of all level of government that issues Orders in Council hold the Constitutional power to arbitrarily abuse this power, even tho it's totally unconstitutional
- After 50 years or 'improving' on a deliberately flawed form, virtually every elected and appointed body is above liability of the law, and these bodies did this in collusion with a body called the Banks, and this meant coloring the police into a body by appointing them to Parliamentary Council, [1998 POLICE ACT]

IN LAW - it will never get better,.because every level of government is just fighting among themselves as to who gets what power.
- No BODY is challenging the fact that "they have no such right"
John Locke defined it as TYRANNY, which occurred from AUTHORITY
'taking what no body doth have a right to take', which is a direct result of ruling like BANKSTERS are our Divine Monarchy under "no man is born Free"

It's irrefutable that our Democratic Parliamentary form has been perverted,
Since Q. Elizabeth II - We have been ruled by these paper Queens AND it's created a form that is so fundamentally worse than any 1-despot King ever could be.
Wake up, all bad forms redress.
But to ignore the good tidings of this offer that is literally being given to you, til the bitter end is unconscionable But, it's not my call