Click here to read the word document that I handed to the registry on Oct 4th
REPORT on Marc Boyer’s October 3rd court appearance
Denial is more than a river in Africa
First] - Upon entering the court building, I told the Sheriffs that if the judge tried to get away by leaving the room without my consent that they were to seize and arrest the judge immediately..
- I then gave sound cause for this notice: i sighted John Graham's last appearance, where the judge mumbled a few words and left the room saying that the written ruling was across the street - [the crowd went one way and John went to jail, never appearing in court] I pointed out that this was not exactly 'handing' down a ruling, and that if she tried to cut and run from either this court ruling or at the sentencing by doing what they did with John's tactic that they were to arrest her, immediately. We argued but agreed to a contract, and he went to advise the judge…
In court I demanded the stayed file #157481 and its co-joined file # 157479-C-3 to be delivered to me under Sec 337 CCC. since these files are very relevant to this case file, because she is using this 157479-C-3 ruling to proceed and told them that this court file, and these 2 files were standing on ‘perverted ground’, and in estoppel.
- I pointed out that I had applied to the court at least 8 times over the past year, and treated with obstruction /malfeasance by especially the 222 Main St. Registry for refusing to deliver my motions to a judge and that every level of city provincial and federal government had refused to seize my file(s) during the past year, and barred from proceeding with ‘everything’
- I made it clear that my Appeals motion was turned down on the ground that i do not 'agree to disagree' that the judge can rule on whatever rule of law she wants from one of the 4 rules of law definitions listed in the DCL, when it's a crime under sec 336 to refuse to uphold Sec 133 of our Constitutional rule of law as Supreme, especially when called to do so.
- Now, I am acting on seizing this file and proceed criminally, under self defense, because the Crown refuses to proceed, and that since she is the first judge in the last year to ‘seize’ my case file(s) that i was making the most of it.
[Due to the undertaking with the Sheriffs, from this point on she kept repeating “What do you want Mr. Boyer?”]
- I demanded under s 337 CCC to hand me the file and the co-joined files and she said no.
- I demanded that she proceed with one count of violating Sec 336 CCC against Ms Bruce and she refused.
- I demanded under s 336 CCC to define what rule of law was Supreme in her court. She refused to answer and
I badgered her from every angle to define it. I got her to admit that she followed the 4th definition in the DCL
"a highly textured legal instrument importing many things" was her default position, and
Then I outlined in great detail that this is legal insanity [DCL] to use this interpretation, in criminal law,
- Especially when the defendant is standing under our Sec 133 definition of our rule of law as Supreme.
- I demanded "give me Justice" and she screamed "NO" I then stopped and read the record back to her; she had just repeated what do you want? I said 'give me Justice' and you screamed 'no' I then asked if she wanted to retract or amend or qualify that response, and she refused. I then demanded her impeachment and declared her legally insane
- I frankly ran out of things for her to refuse /reject, [no matter to a thing] so I agreed to stand down till Friday's appearance and got the last word in: "under Sec 8 CCC - I deny my consent to be governed under anything but the Elections Act, on the solid ground that it's the only jurisdiction where I hold a legal straw-man called: 'person'. Voila! The 1st Official political prisoner since Riel, which caused the abandonment of Queen Victoria’s trust, by repealing Sec-2 of the Constitution,
- I face a short incarceration and they face a total denial to 'give me Justice' and reject their ticket to Paradise [Luke 18].
- It’s just deserts - This judge truly wishes to die, the look of possession on her face when she screamed ‘NO’ was well noted by at least 6 Sheriffs who just stood in awe. - They will do what they will do, and I will act in reaction to her ruling.
- They are deliberately refusing the new Covenant. Frankly, I couldn't agree more with their decision.
- Not one is worth saving, and if the Sheriffs drop the ball on Friday, then they are doomed to a merciless death
- Can't say I haven't tried... I truly pity the misery of the forever they impale themselves with. I can’t make a camel drink...
It's not mine to question why the Spirit chooses to not intercede, but then we will witness an accelerated path of/to the most amazing event anyone has ever seen and it humbles me to be just a lamb to this slaughter. This is not a death wish - It's a ‘get a life wish’ for me, it's their death wish. They all repent at the teachings of Jonah [one way or the other] and
- I'm so disposable now to the bigger equation that IT'S SOMEWHAT LIBERATING.to have reached my purpose
The creation waits impatiently to be liberated from the bondage of decay, and I anxiously wait in anticipation for their rejection to be the footstools of God’s wrath, [it all 'renders' down to faith - the game goes on another tangent; that's all]
Maybe the firmly entrenched prayers of the Christians will appear <that Jacob will fail to seize a moment> and, some’thing’ will come true. It's not my call but the creation is more than just waiting, the force is omnipotent.
My path waits in the ruling, I was driven to get answers, [I’ve got them] by listening carefully to what the unjust judge says'
I have been hardened for a lot worse then I've been dealt, so maybe I get to play some more, after all we’re still at the starting blocks of tribulations, I’ll gladly play any role, and pay any price for the return of Paradise, mine is not to shrink
Bottom line is that Jacob literally will choose to die rather than legalize cannabis
– Comfort for God’s new chosen ones
loveisarose
marc boyer |