NOTICE
TO ALL EXISTING PARTY MEMBERS: Under the
Elections Act. all memberships to the party need to be renewed
after a federal election writ drops.
THIS MEANS: In order to benefit from a lawful Sec 8 CCC Territorial
defense, your old membership really needs to be renewed after
each election [that means now]
FREE Marijuana
Party Membership Cards
are available simply by filling out and handing us
our standard Elections Canada form
This membership offers a really
good legal defense for possession of medicine,
as a jurisdiction issue under political territorial protection
[Sec 39 CCC]
under a CLAIM OF RIGHT to peacefully possess your medicine
Click
Here to read /download Bud Oracles campaign flyer
If you're from Vancouver, you may have heard
him as The City Barker during this election
Click
Here to download the actual
"Elect Marc Boyer"
PDF flyer
Click
Here to read my
"Turn Gastown into Grasstown" flyer
Anyone
can run
for CITY COUNCIL,
or Mayor in any
City Municipal Election, and be Instrumental in Abandoning Colonial
rule.
- Virtually every CITY CORPORATION has the same
Charter [since 1955] THEREFORE this can be done in any community
just go to the City Archives & look for yourself
KNOWLEDGE IS POWER - KNOW YOUR ENEMY
Presenting
an opportunity to abolish Colonial rule.
Let's 1st
define what I mean by Colonial rule.
By this, I'm referring to George
Bush' version of Colonial rule
- We Canadians need not feel picked on, the USA - ECONOMY
demands compliance from the whole world
My
Contention is fundamental: That
since the end of WWII, we've been a colony of the USA, under what
started as the [martial] Marshall Plan
- Which was not much better than being a company asset of the
Hudson's Bay Company
But,
then that's one of the reasons we 'formed' a Constitution in 1867.
Since then, uptil Queen Elizabeth II, we were Loyal Subjects of
the One King of the Empire
I hold as irrefutable that, we, the people, have been 'converted'
to be a company liability (not an asset - because
of debts) of NAFTA, who enforce this New World Order, under
a police state called: CIVILIAN
OVERSIGHT, which is the exact opposite of the
citizens 'overseeing' the police
WELCOME TO THE NEW WORLD ORDER under The Dicey Doctrine
We once were Loyal Subjects with equal protection of
published laws under the Supremacy of God and a Constitutional
rule of law AND
W ith NAFTA we are disloyal subjects [like the Irish in 1900]
where we are handed equal treatment by unpublished rules and laws
with an uncodified Constitution
With a stoke of an unconstitutional pen everything cast since
1559 under Queen Elizabeth
was abolished. This is when England enshrined
the Act of Supremacy which caste into law a revolutionary idea
THAT: all laws rules and regulations apply to the Monarch as well
with the Monarch protecting Loyal Subjects under the rule of law.
[As opposed to the King being above the law & ruling
his Subjects by his laws]
This Covenant was enforced by the courts, when the Stuart
clan were deposed & the Westminster Archetypal form became
the order of the Commonwealth, which is exactly how Canada was
administered for the fist 122 years.
it's absolutely
the Greatest grand father clause of them all.
AND
Our enlightened Politician trashed it in 1989 in order to make
us a colony under NAFTA
Throughout
history, there's been so many people who have expressed
the need to abandon Colonial rule that it fills libraries.
BUT This PERVERT Brian Mulroney
did not free us from Colonial Rule.
- He converted us to a slave colony of what the Pentagon war machine
now calls the CORPORATION & it's bigger than their allegiance
to the flag; it's called the ECONOMY stupid
NAFTA is now the ruling governing body that is over the USA, Canada
& Mexico, AND - NAFTA does not have any citizens -
it's a consortium of Banksters, who actually rule like Kings under
provisions of the 1931 Colonial Act
IN LAW it's impossible to take the mechanisms for abolishing Colonial
Rule out.
BUT in law, they don't have to tell the people how...
All of this Corporate take-over & all this unconstitutional
bullshit is supposed to stop in an orderly manner by applying
any of the mechanisms for abolishing Colonial Rule AND the easiest
way to do that is at City Hall, by following due process as prescribed
by law as to Sec-1 of the Charter
The Keys to Abolishing Colonial Rule are with the people by electing
a Mayor or any Council member who will take an oath of allegiance
to uphold the Constitution
Ever since the 1931 Colonial Act, no one who is elected
has to take an oath of allegiance to the King of the Empire in
order to give more regional autonomy to the Colony. In Canada,
they said our Age of Conquest was over..
As I found under 0aths of Office under
Sec 159 of the City Charter
- it says that: a person taking Office on Council can take
an Oath of allegiance AND NO CITY ELECTED OFFICIAL
EVER HAS
In law, when no one on Council signs this Oath, means this Council
is upholding 'an express colour' to uphold Colonial rule.
And that now means protecting this fascist State
On the grounds that:
the 'trust' of whether to continue to uphold England's values
was left to 'local political autonomy'- which is fine until 1982,
when we brought our Constitution home from England'
BUT: After 1982, by having no one sign an oath of allegiance
means this ELECTED BODY is NOT legally responsible for upholding
the now Canadian Constitution, under Maritime jurisdiction
If anyone elected to Council ever signed an oath of allegiance,
it would send such shock waves to the City that for all intents
& purposes this Councilor would be more powerful than the
Mayor. [Sec 158 says it's only valid while he's
alive]
AND if a Mayor signed an oath of allegiance to the Constitution,
means he could take that Scepter and smash the table [platform]
that it sits on, because Colonial Rule would be abolished. It
really is not a hard concept to convince the people that everything
would be better for them. It would create civilized life &
normative order. [which is close to what's
called restorative justice]
All Public Officials would give us 'equal protection under the
rule of law' instead of equal treatment by bad laws imposed
in order to service a fraudulent public debt

NOW here's a Peaceful form of protest anyone
can do
I
invite anyone in any community at any public meeting to
ask your Mayor: "why he will not swear an oath of allegiance
to the Constitution ?" &
watch him squirm...
and - Then ask him:
Why his Chief Constable doesn't take an oath during a time of
war?
NOW
THIS NEXT SET OF FACTS ARE REALLY IMPORTANT & a hornet's nest
The
Vancouver Archives will show that: the only time in Vancouver's
history, when an Oath of allegiance was taken, was in 1941, during
World War II, when ALL POLICE OFFICERS SWORE THIS OATH:
"to
serve our Sovereign Lord the King, cause the peace to be kept
& preserved, prevent all offences against the persons &
properties of His Majesty's Subjects & others, according to
Law"
- They
took this Oath 'during' the war, because the King declared it
as a Constitutional necessity:
In order to limit the overt use of power that is inherent during
wartime AND to prevent using built-in Colonial rule inequities
during war-time to wage war on the King's Loyal Subjects and others
Why
was an oath of allegiance not done when we entered this War?
BUT by taking this oath all this AUTHORITY under CIVILIAN OVERSIGHT
I'VE
BEEN PRESSING THIS ISSUE FOR THE LAST 2 ELECTION BACK THEN I CALLED
IT: TREASON but it's actually
under
LEGAL INSANITY [Sec 16 CCC] which is defined
in law as omitting the obvious and failing to see the harm created
by omitting the obvious
THE
BIGGER ISSUE IS THAT THE POLICE FILED A CLAIM OF RIGHT TO DO THE
EXACT OPPOSITE - in 1998 in The Federal
Police Act & then in the BC Police Act, which included an
experimental PART-9, which became a criminal act once Canada declared
WAR in Afghanistan in 2001
PLEASE
NOTE: (I didn't make this up - it's a published document)
The 1st fundamental
Principle is CIVILIAN
OVERSIGHT:
" Police must be authorized to
do things that would be illegal for ordinary citizens,"
& “Police must not be unduly fettered in the
exercise of those powers PART-9 of the Police Act
Constitutional
law limits to the abuse of force by police is:
- Police can (under exceptional circumstances) break
some laws
- The difference between must & can is the
difference between us living in a 'police state' or living in
a 'Free &
Democratic society'
& All we have to do to get rid of this abuse is to vote
for a Mayor who will take an oath of allegiance to uphold the
Constitution, which is what all politicians were supposed
to do in 1982, when they pirated our Constitution back to Canada.
They said that under the 1931 Colonial Act, they didn't have
to. BUT all that changes by one person taking an oath of allegiance
because he wants too to what's right
Our
Canadian Parliament, [as
well as the rest of the free world]
since 9-11
declared,
legislated & is fully subscribed to a WAR ON TERROR
in what in escalating
rhetoric will be called World War III - with
a 1st strike policy against an undefined enemy that can't negotiate
peace
Working for the Economy means
never-ending War
- Lest we not forget 'War is hell',
especially when these Americans want to
wage this war on the world, which MUST include pillaging our
resources.
The reason this Oath of allegiance, by
our Civil police,
was not automatically enacted during this World War is
because this war forces government to turn against its own citizens,
by serving the economy before the people.
Ps: Whose economy? [& more appropriate]
Who is economy? [it's a faceless dead-thing]
The USA's vision of WW-III has
a real objective of forcing every Nation in the world to enter
into a de-facto civil war on its own minorities, to benefit
their Economy
Our Sovereignty is worth defending, which means protecting it
& we can do something about it by voting for the abolishing
of Colonial Rule
The new world order of NAFTA is an obligation
to uphold
- "by the people for the ECONOMY".
The ECONOMY has always been a weapon of
warfare to control foreign influence and power
in
Law, the only other way Colonial rule can be abolished
is by the BAR changing back to upholding Constitutional law.
They got us all in this mess in 1993 by voting to uphold
this de facto bullshit of the Dicey Doctrine,
This "formally'
occurred in 1993, when the
BAR abandoned their Oath of allegiance and
re'formed' it into the new Barrister's and Solicitor's Oath.to
the Bankster's rule of law and they sealed in 1998 in the POLICE
ACT when God was removed from every oath in Canada.
The fix is as simple as just going back into the same room and
repeal or reverse this perverted oath to uphold banksters
AND my Act of Supremacy Challenge
deals with this issue at the Federal level
The
path I'm following in law is called CIVILIZATION
which is taking a criminal case through civil
court - it's a new legal word definition introduced in 1985 when
they started this mess and in law it must be a peaceful democratic
process.
Democracy is a platform where it
only takes one citizen to stand for our beliefs through a political
guarantee
of freedom of expression,
and beg for your support.
Simply by exercising your political right, in the privacy
of a voting booth, will literally
make all the difference in the world
War Acts: like relinquishing
citizens like Marc Emery; taking real estate from landlords with
grow-ops, American Police on patrol in our country, etc, just
stop because it violates the citizen's war-time rights
I
can save the world, [and
any one else can]
if we only knew
what to do. So I leave it up to you.
The Millennium is here.
Vote for change or have it served on you
by Authority.
Vote for anyone who will take an
Oath of allegiance
but then ...NOBODY BUT NOBODY EVER
SAID FREEDOM WAS CHEAP
|