These
documents were filed in March as an add-on in my Appeals file CA 033602
where a BC Appeals tribunal eventually did 'address' my
identity issue. and obviously refused to act
- I got no answer as to who could rule on my identity
issue
I was told that nothing less than the AG
of BC level was where I could seek remedy, and rather than sending me
to him, this Appeals Cout sent me packing to a Panel, [without seizing
the file], and this panel dismissed the case because I was in
the wrong courtroom. [without seizing the file] [TYRANNY - they had no
such right]
This [quasi-legal]
Justice is full of clever tricks;
By not seizing the file, they are not lawfully responsible for reading
it, and or ruling on it,
and they can legally do this forever in order to avoid any issue, because
they have perverted
the law
Now in order to get to a Chief Justice means I have to file a Petition,
and when I tried to do this, I was served a document titled GAG ORDER
telling me that I must go through a solicitor.
So this means i can address a GAG ORDER with our new Mayor Sam Sullivan,
because it was issued by the previous administration in 2005. So this
caused me to get creative, in order to have someone seize my file, and
challenge an old GAG ORDER, and deliver my identity issue to a Chief Judge
in one document.
Failure to seize the file caused me to file
and seize Paul Hancock, the DIRECTOR of the
City of Vancouver, for an original BIRTH CERTIFICATE
[this they cannot avoid]
[which was originally posted here and in the top link above]
___________________________________________________March 14th, 2007
FILED IN: THE COURT OF APPEALS SDG file: # CA33602
RE:
To providing clarity to my identity issue,
and insight to the nature of the damages award
My
statement of birth was defaced (fraudulently converted) in 1989
by the Deputy Registrar of Ontario.
This means that under sec 340 CCC, the Queen has broken the contract to
hold my person. - Therefore, She has no authority (at all) over me, until
this fraudulent possession is addressed.
Because
this crime was committed against an adult makes me a slave (period),
under Sec 338 CCC - Had I asked for a 2nd Passport since
then, would imply that I agree to this conversion; I will not do this.
As I brought up on my March 7th date; this court must 'address'
this Passport issue, (or) this society itself becomes a prison,
and
that by resolving this issue we create a way to peacefully return to 'civilized
life'
(in
law) I hold a court order where I cannot address my identity issue with
my M.P. – Libby Davies - As to attached documentation this position
constitutes criminal insanity by the Crown and Libby
The solution to my Passport, by definition, must be resolved before I
am issued a second Passport, on the belief that I cannot stay or leave
without resolving a guarantee to the ‘security of my person’
with this issue.
I am 'entitled' to a Passport that does not deprive me of my birthright;
under Sec 340 CCC, no judge can refuse to recognize me, or ignore my desire
to be a Canadian Subject of King George's Registry
By issuing me a Canadian Passport, as a citizen under duress, under a
claim of right means that any (crime) perceived offense of trespassing
on the Crown's domain must be heard in civil court first; this means that
I can benefit from a defense, under Sec 39 CCC, to uphold God's Creation,
under the Charter of Rights
This means that no one who subscribes under this claim of right
can be treated criminally first, and by definition, this remedy
is defined as 'civilization': it's fulfilling the promise to return to
'civilized life' In order to preclude the arbitrary use of power under
Freedom of Expression to uphold Creation
Constitutionally no court can obstruct or deny anyone from benefiting
from this Association, and no court, let alone, a panel can ignore that
the real jurisdiction of this case actually stands under: Boyer v R
When
I was arraigned, the judge agreed that I was charged with 'a crime of
thought' and asked me to file for damages. I immediately handed
my denial of
consent to be governed except under the Supremacy of God's
rule of law.
(That's
it) and I clearly outlined my identity issue in this document to hold
my entitlement as inalienable
From this point on, the Crown had no case; everyone
who held this file were placed in total stupor, absolutely everyone went
out of their way to prove they could deprive me of any and all my rights.
When I went to this final trial date, I refused to stand under the Charter,
or a Charter Challenge, and I made it clear that I was standing
under the founding principle of Canada and the Supremacy of God's rule
of law,
In fact, Judge Bruce, lamented that this was a highly unusual,
and she correctly agreed to proceed I then delivered
an 'iron clad' defense to be a 'private individual', under the Elections
Act, and that under the Marijuana Party, we could protect our members
from benefiting from God's rule of law under positive law.
- In fact, my defense (as outlined in an attached file) of defending
God's rule of law went on for hours, Judge Bruce correctly did
not state the Charter in her Reasons for Sentencing, but She also made
no direct reference to God's (or any) rule of law. This omission
in her ruling is by definition: criminal insanity [DCL]
This liability of a Sec 336 CCC violation, by definition, converts this
jurisdiction to: Boyer v Regina
Under sec 337 CCC
- I seek probate that reverses a fundamental flaw in this ruling:
Everyone and every body must stand under God's rule of law as
Supreme
To
excuse Her omission [in line 7] She transfers this liability onto Elections
Canada for my mistaken belief, which clearly forces me, under Sec 8 CCC
in self-defense, to drag Jean Pierre Kingsley into this case file
The
liability created by the nonfeasance from this natural person converts
this liability to: Boyer v R
The liability created by calling the Governor General on Her trust, after
the Writ is dropped aggravates this liability to reveal the true nature
of this offense. John Locke defined it tyranny: it was created by
serving two masters.
The crime is TREACHERY: defined as collusion with the treasury
to convert a country's rule of law It's an international
crime being committed by those who are supposed to defend society from
it - As stated in court:
We live in the most criminally organized society in the history of mankind
This
truly is the wicked generation, outlined by Jesus
in Matthew 23; we are living in the end times
My
contention is that: collusion between the Bank Act and Brian Mulroney
has created a vice that cranks tighter ever since the Sunset
provisions of 1985, which enables the banks to rule as a
natural person, and improve the racket of converting everyone to warehouse
receipts, under a new perverted definition of colore officii,
which totally perverted the law through an
addiction to lexicography, by standing under roman &
feudal law
- My contention is that the BAR
swore an oath to the bankster's rule of law in 1993, due
to improvements made to the
1992 Sunset provisions, and that Civilian
Oversight in the 1998 Police Act was created by the 1997
Sunset provisions, and this robbery in 2002 enabled foreign police to
trespass any jurisdiction, at will
.
Stephen Harper gave everything that encompasses
Maritime jurisdiction to NATO, within the first 100-days
in Office.
All it needs is 1-more election, and it doesn't matter who wins, we all
loose…
It's inevitable that IF this panel does not seize a moment to intervene
in this round of the Sunset provisions that banksters will seize my file
to MUSTer one giant leap into perversion, because they just can't help
it
Robbery is not a crime; it's one authority exorcizing authority in another
jurisdiction under this new colore officii,
which now is defined as
“ under economic duress”, under this undefined 'rule
of nature'
My Lord's nature is like a hen wanting to gather her children
under her wings;
but this not Baal's nature
In
regard to my damages award and a tribunal:
The very nature of this damages award
is apocalyptic;
It's being pressed by the same natural
person who is delivering the message of the Spirit of Life.
A tribunal understands strictly administrative law, and holds more power
than a Queen and any bank (period) - She serves the best interest
of society itself, especially when seized with the trust of fulfilling
Romans 13.
It's my opinion that this panel could register an intervener, and transfer
this liability to a higher tribunal to enforce.
- This higher tribunal could administer the trust, and redeem every
debt in the world, simply by recognizing the opportunity created by my
case files.
This tribunal must hold the trust until the Messiah returns
. So be it.
Imagine:
In so doing, the courts rule over the banks, under the trust of
upholding Creation. It would mean a banking system where there is
no usury; all of society would unite under this trust,
To fulfill prophecy, the BAR created its own snare and trap, and by recognizing
this stumbling block,
You are being offered retribution. In order to earn it, legally
means paying off the fraud created by the seven wicked sisters.
Technically
it's robbing the banks, but it's not. This damage award
redeems this liability, by paying these notes from K George's treasury,
created by the notes of this paper Queen in order to administer this trust
and treasure, as to Jesus’ parable of the ten talents, until the
Messiah returns.
The
need to pay all debt is important to the whole simply because it's key
to metanoia (a paradigm shift)
By definition, to believe that: nothing would happen to our
collective conscious, that nothing would be generated from the collective
sigh of hope created from all debt forgiven, means you're in stupor.
Do you believe in miracles? I do.
I am convinced that the Creation itself will be liberated with
just this sigh,
Imagine:
The transformation into awakening has nothing to do with me. It's what
we do with it that counts. This offer really can only be pressed
once, in order to be revealed to those who did not ask for Him.
Rom 10
The
simplicity of the hidden message in Romans 8-on is that: to uphold Creation
is the Spirit of life,
It's
being meek; it's sharing in the burden and sharing in the glory, in order
to inherit the earth
The impact of providing an answer to this age old riddle is that from
this point on we are empowered by God Almighty to act, in order
to prevent a bloodbath that is totally avoidable, by following the law.
Recognize that you are being offered, as promised, a chance to enter our
Golden Age in Paradise.
In
the event that anyone wants to dispute the fact that we face God's promise
in the 2nd commandment, of 1000 generations, can but you are in denial
of the obvious. This millennium is converting to a new Creation
It's the message that counts it's not the messenger,
in fact everyone will object to something I say,
- it's the message of hope that cannot be ignored.
I am driven to the wonder that lies in Rom 13:
All debt
will be forgiven, except the debt of love for your neighbor;
it then lists 5 commandments.
Ps: Freedom is contained in this
cornerstone of law: “what is not directly prohibited cannot
be implied”
-These missing commandments mean a multi cultural Peaceful society exists;
AND to me, the most glaring commandment that's missing is:
“
we cannot lie”[9th Commandment]
- It's gone! Its absence defines our evolution to man'kind'
Imagine:
To be in an awakening means anyone who is not awake cannot succeed in
lying to you; - Lying becomes a futile act;
we know fully as well as you are fully known within the Creation.
[1Cor13]
The tree of life is being joined to the tree of knowledge to the glorious
freedom of all God's children.
Jesus Christ said that he was in nature not of nature. My message
is the same, it's all within you.