Click here to open the actual Word doc posted in court record

Tuesday July 23rd, 2007          AFFIDAVIT filed and attached to 3 witnesses

  1. On the weight of the testimony presented, at 222 Main St., at a Show Cause Hearing(s) of both July 16th and July 17th appearances  ``I am filing this APPLICATION TO APPEAR BEFORE A JUDGE
  2. In order to seek remedy through properly adhering to form in order to seek resolution to file # 182787-1
    1.  On the grounds that [albeit done in good faith] it was an erroneous assumption [by myself and Judge Kitchen] that I would find remedy in Supreme Court, which lead him to solicit the erroneous belief that we should wave my right to an arraignment hearing on file # 182787-1
  3. Let it be clearly understood that our faith of good results being offered by this Justice were dismissed
  4. Therefore in order to force the courts to face the liability of upholding a criminally unconstitutional form, I am applying to appear before a Judge on Short Leave, in order to enter a plea of guilty on this charge.
    1. On the clear understanding that due to the political nature of these charges THAT: I must challenge any Judge to choose to uphold the Criminal Code of Canada and Democracy itself by respecting the rule of law as Supreme under the Order of the Garter [or] rule THAT
    2. He must obey the rule of a form that is under occupation [by what’s called the spirit of death in  Rom 7]
    3. In order to recognize that the trust of the Commonwealth is being called upon to manifest Destiny  
  5.  In so doing we will get the testimony /response from one of three witnesses, as in prophecy in Heb 10,
  1. Whereas, on file #  180671-1, I was ordered in good faith, by Judge Kitchen, on June 20th 2007 to file for a BAIL VARIANCE UNDERTAKING in the Supreme Court to seek remedy to my identity issue and seek redress to revoking all conditions against my person, on this file and on this new file # 182787-1
    1. Whereas, to this order, I filed this undertaking on Friday July 13th /07, and did get arrested about 3 hours later on file # 182787-1, and this liability is now attached to this Supreme Court case file
  2. Let it be clearly understood that when this Justice dismissed this BAIL UNDERTAKING(s), he arbitrary ruled to the effect that ‘he was rejecting the law of Moses’, as opposed to ‘violating the law of Moses’
    1. Let it also be clearly understood that I did call the Deputy Ministry of the Attorney General’s Office and ordered Allen Seckell and/or Wally Oppal to call me immediately, in order to respond to this ruling, and                  As always, no one is accountable for anything, but obstruction of Justice
  3. Let it be clearly understood that the trust of the Commonwealth is being held by this Justice, whose Sheriffs keep flip flopping from one side of the BAR to the other, at these last appearances, therefore
    1. Let it be clearly understood that Allen Seckell must stand firmly on one side or the other, and
    2. Appeal this ruling by forwarding it to a tribunal, or submit to the wicked and adulterous generation   
  4. The horrors that will be created by not complying with the law are predicted as inevitable, but it simply will not happen to all branches, do not follow those who are lost in a death cult, so either get over it [or]
    1. believe that it’s time to follow your heart and follow the law for the law’s sake in order to be saved
    2. Whatever the Sheriffs do at will constitute the testimony of the 2nd of 3 witnesses in Hebrews 10
  1. Now in regard to the 3rd witness, yesterday, I called Elections Canada to address the liability created by triggering consequences in ‘the Act’ in file # 1700-059-E06-10-L-5, and left a message to have the proper authority respond and address the liability contained in this file, and it cannot be denied that
    1. They forwarded the call to a lawyer who refused to address anything because he knew nothing.  It’s just another classic case of “of course they know” they are lost in the spirit of a death wish
  2. This nonfeasance forces me to file our Quadra EDA Elections Canada documents with the Supreme Court of Canada Registry, and into these two case files, in order to respond to a simple question that this lawyer refused to address: Where is my $1000. deposit? [&] What rule of law is Supreme in Parliament?
    1. By attaching this Affidavit(s) to file # 182787-1 and file #  180671- 1 - should force the Office of Elections Canada to appear at my next court date and follow the law for the law’s sake, [or]
    2. Be the 3rd witness, who through simple omission [nonfeasance] triggers consequences in the Act

NOTICE OF LIABILITY: We are facing tribulations because we all asked for it.  I want a Banquet and they want a Wedding.   Tribulation can be so glorious for all; resistance to metanoia (an about face in mindset) will be the cause of self-inflicted horrors.  The seven lampposts that have contained /hidden this beacon of Hope are being called to deliver a message, [and to mention but 2] 1) The press needs to objectively present the news, and
2) Mark Levy [Forensic Sciences] needs to address a trust to show cause for not recognizing the new Covenant
We’re only at the beginning of our embrace with the Conquerors of love; all you need to apply is love
It all comes down to faith that God is delivering a promise to surrender to a consuming fire [love] So be it