This reference from the Cessation of Quebec has impacted our rule of law, as it is now the preface to this rule

“At its most basic level the rule of law vouchsafes to the citizens, a stable, predicable and orderly society in order to conduct our affairs.  It provides a shield to individuals from arbitrary state of action” 1998

20. I'm a persecuted politician under a publication ban for being forthright in upholding my beliefs, that the commonwealth rule of law is Supreme, while being prosecuted by Authority who insist that it is not,

I entered into this endeavor with full knowledge that Authority has abandoned God's rule of law, and for the love of my Country
I sacrificed myself for the greater good, with the object of this mission being the return of normative order, which I believe is the trust of the commonwealth and manifest destiny

21. I have been enticing authority to arrest me and enter into a trap and this resulted in 3 case files
1. The first file is #150272 (Jan 2004) the 2nd file is # 157479 and the 3rd file is # 157481(Sept 2004)
   
2. I've been handed the Crown's Conviction and Reason for Sentence
   on the 2nd file # 157479 and this case is an open file in Court of Appeals pending for over a year before it was addressed to a Chief Justice ,

1. Which are now co-joined at one pre-trial hearing, which cannot be avoided

I'm in court on 4:20,The Justice system must toss-out both of these remaining case files because

1. In case file # 150272:  There is no mens rea documentation, no Grounds of Belief, no Warrant, and this case has already been pressed at my 1st pre-trial to contain a broken chain of evidence

Ps: On the trial-date, the Crown did not show up, so I filed a Notice with Prejudice into this court record, and moments later my Compassion Club was raided on the other 2 case files

Court records will show that a bench warrant was issued for my no-show up at this trial. - On this point alone: all 3 files are nothing but a liability of criminal breach of trust charges

In case file # 157481:  There is no mens rea, and the only grounds to proceed is the conviction that did not go as planned on case file # 157479, therefore there's a broken chain of evidence

2. Because of these crimes, and knowing that I was not going to be governed under the rule of law I entered my denial of consent to be governed document, for just cause, at my arraignment
3. Any 1 of these factors gets the cases tossed, it's just a matter of administrative justice, and for the prosecution to have no Essential elements across 2 co-joined case files is unfathomable,
   
4. All of this liability was compounded on top of each other because I refused to pay a lawyer to cut a deal with the Tyrants who hold me as a slave of the courts, for upholding our rule of law
5. These 2 case files must be ‘handed over’, and the liability in each of these files will easily net the maximum award in Provincial court which is $100,000. for each count = $200,000.

1. And I strongly believe the Crown will not contest this award, so it’s a default judgment . Otherwise the deconstruction of the file will surface far greater liability

7. Ps: Payment of any damages award is the key to holding a recognized political Claim of Right‘ This would be the first Canadian Claim of Right, which would allow similar compassion clubs to open up across Canada, like Legion Clubs - except without municipal or police interference

1. Under freedom of contract with any Marijuana Party Electoral District Association (EDA)
2. With full liability protection under section 39 (1) CCC DEFENCE WITH CLAIM OF RIGHT
1. Upholding that any club-member can defend themselves while trespassing on the Crown's Domain while in peaceful possession of articles of belief
2. Recognizing s-39 (2) That those who are not club-members have no such right
   To guarantee our Freedom of Expression to attract social and political participation, and in order to protect our private club’s rights that the majority might consider wrong or false


8. Ps: I also believe THAT: under our Tyranny, all of this would be erased by an Order in Council if it wasn't without this liability of the criminal estoppel /wrongful conviction case, and my inaliable right to be governed under the common rule of law as Supreme.

FREEDOM: Freedom means, no one is to act in a way contrary to his beliefs and conscience (r v Big M Drug Mart)

23. In the event THAT the Crown does not pay a damages award, I deny consent to be governed, and this has nothing to do with cannabis access; my fundamental freedom and inaliable right to be protected by God's rule of law, is greater than any allegiance to any authority who desires to rule through tyranny
1. Cast me off as a political refugee, because under a publication ban, which will inevitably continue without a payment,
   I ' m a sitting duck for more Tyranny, and silenced like a lamb
2. By every standard of decency cast me off as a political refugee
   I don't want to be your slave,
   
3. To be denied the right to be ruled under
   God's rule of law embodies the Nature of Tyranny

DENIAL OF CONSENT TO BE GOVERNED is every individual’s right, and to deny this right is tyranny

24. The real liability is having a criminal conviction in file # 157479:
    
    this constitutes criminal ESTOPPEL
1. On the solid ground THAT:
   The total abuse of process by both the Crown and the Judiciary to achieve this conviction is so outrageous as to constitute judicial and administrative ESTOPPEL,
2. 
   Ps: 2-against-1-innocent victim, who was denied the right be ruled under our rule of law, constitutes a crime that shocks the public consciousness and rocks the public trust at its Coeur

The outrageous Nature of the matter of this ESTOPPEL is exactly why sec-11 (d) of our Charter was created, which is to deal with matters that are insulting to the courts with a 3 man public tribunal

1. This is where the matter of Prime Minister Brian Mulroney's treachery can be addressed, also
2. This is where we can address the Perfection of Creation as our common trust, by upholding that

“Canada is founded on recognizing the principle of the Supremacy of God's Creation and the rule of law”

26. In the event THAT this demand for a tribunal is denied then may God have mercy on your soles, on the belief that humanity will again miss another opportunity to fulfill God's promise of Peace on Earth, and the divide of casting a new Millennium will be the will of your own doing, under the force of Nature
    

27. The true danger lies in this analogy THAT:
    I am painting a lion into a corner, and I am but a mouse,

I desire to remove a thorn from the lion's paw. 
I place my faith in God that the lion will accept my favor