This 7- PART SERIES was posted in Sept 2007

I edited it and did minor changes to it in May 2010, and like the rest of this Appendix series there is almost no biblical references

Appendix: 5 - The Principle of Consent of the Governed Government is powerless without it.

This principle's introduction in the common law of England
was literally bathed in blood, and was caste with Parliament taking power
over the Stuarts, ushering in the rise of our Westminster archetypal form. 
This form was the backbone of the commonwealth.  It regulated commerce under respondeat superior and administered the affairs of the people under
the Magna Carta's rule of law of perle gem terrae

This man in the picture is Archibald Cox He wrote a great paper on
| this subject on 1987[just before he impeached Nixon]

The full text of s. 39 of Magna Carta reads as follows:
[back when there were slaves and cerfs - this was the law of the land]
"No freeman shall be taken or (and) imprisoned or disseised or outlawed or exiled orin any way destroyed, nor will we go upon him nor send upon him, except by the lawful judgement of his peers or (and) by the law of the land."

    1. This 700 year-old rule is the direct ancestor of our Constitutional rule of law and the Charter of Rights
The common rule of law reference to freeman is gone
because in ORDER to maintain consent of the governed slavery was abolished, before Canada was formed and this trust was caste in the principles of fundamental justice, but Canada has no case law on many issues, and authority has a long history of ignoring our unwritten constitution.   R v Duplessie (1956) confirmed that our rule of law was cast in stone and this case law is very relevant to my case files.
    1. Louis Riel and our Union movement would have had much better treatment if it it was ruled as unconstitutional that it's was unwritten.
      But, my belief is that 'no case law' is irrelevant on slavery,
      because nobody wants to be a slave.
      It violates the principle of consent to be governed,
      and rocks the law of Nature at its Coeur
  1. Quote from: The Rule of Law in the Canadian Constitution:

     What happens when government by the "consent of
    the governed" no longer "secures these rights"?      
Neither Locke nor Jefferson answered this question.
The practical problem of reconciling "majority rule" with "minority rights" was left to the founders of new liberal democracies such as the United States and Canada.     (Ps: to manifest destiny)

The minority rights at stake here is the Banks claim of right to rule under economic duress - All the 'colorful terms' that are used to make a claim of right to uphold bonded seritude returned in Black's 6th, 1985 & Black's 7th 1991


In these Law Dictionary prefixes, they openly admit to large scale radical changes in words across all fields of law, because of greater understanding (standing-under) of feudal and roman law
(Ps: In order to undertand [stand-under] how slavery works legally)
      1. Brian Mulroney used the art of Tyranny
        with Black's 7th to do the Banks dirty work in 1985 to create fundamentally perverted changes to the law with just word definitions changes
Parliament legislated the DCL as the only law dictionary of Canada,
and in so doing perverted the law thru LEXICOGRAPHY
(in 1991) Ps: fulfilling Jefferson 's warning: these Bankers will not stop until they enslaved the world, and rule like King
- Just like Napoleon, it didn't matter that we voted the bastards out for doing this, The Liberals were correct to make a National priority of paying off the National dept. The obscenity of this FRAUD is that its absolutely impossible to pay-off this dept

How does anyone challenge this mess that we're in?  
I'm following a plan and did it with stealth The civilized way is to take it to civil court, but this pay as you go justice is perverted with arbitrarily rule.
BUT: They continue to enforce a ban from filing any papers in the Supreme Court without a lawyer that's been in affect since 2004
Ps: the Nature of despair is omnipresent, when tyranny rules,

To quote John Locke s-199-202
- AS usurpation is the exercise of power, which another hath a right to; so tyranny is the exercise of power beyond right, which no body can have a right to. -  It is a mistake, to think this fault is proper only to monarchies; other forms of government are liable to it, as well as that: for where-ever the power be.
It becomes tyranny, whether those that thus use it are one or many.  Wherever law ends, tyranny begins

I believe THAT tyranny reigns, when
 in 1998, the Police Act legislated, an experi'mental' Part-9 to the Act [by definition it's an oximoron]

  1. that PART-9 states: Police must be authorized to do things that would be illegal for ordinary citizens
CONSTITUIONALLY [if] I EVER GOT BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA
This would in law be called CIVILIZATION: (Black's 7th, 1991) It's defined as
- The transformation of a criminal matter to a civil one by law and by judgment
Now one might ask… How do you civilize a criminal court case? 
(Ps: Normally you appeal a judgment)
BUT my contention is that that's where the problem starts
- Under this new Charter's interpretation, it being used as a tool for tyranny

- IN this perverted LAW: If you file a Charter Challenge that asks for, or appeals a ruling , or requests. the courts thru any Applications to recognize God-given rights. THEN THAT MEANS in their screwed up logic
that you are giving them permission to say no in this new multi cultural society
Sec - 11 of our Charter clearly states that I can seek remedy through any lawful means of my choice
    1. I have a proven track record of manipulating a criminal matter
      into ESTOPPEL, which most definitely is a lawful means
      to beat a case - (Ps: albeit unorthodox)
      By definition when a case is in estoppel the defendant is entitled to
      full commercial damages, in civil caourt [AKA The Supreme Court]
    2. These damages must be paid, and it's subject to
      punitive damages, and there is no appeal
      - It's just a matter of administrative judgment
      (Ps: Sound like our new sec-7 Charter rights)
    3. My criminal case is under administrative and judicial estoppel, this is an extremely powerful tool
  1. Criminal ESTOPPEL is what Archibald Cox called:

    the source of the wildest opportunities men have ever enjoyed to remake society without repeated violence in contests for physical and economic power.
    1. I'm convinced THAT this is the key to a benevolent Millennium transformation: Ps:where we fix the archetypal form by perfecting it
    2. The hope of mankind is always that a new generation may begin to make a new world quicker.(Archibald Cox - 1967)
This is exactly what is achievable with criminal ESTOPPEL:
the form is fixed, and we move on,
  1. By every standard of administrative judicial and criminal justice my case law file will show THAT
  2. I have placed the form in ESTOPPEL, the actors administered the form to the letter, It's the form that needs fixing and
  3. in the greater order of the law of Nature, we face a divide of reaping what we sew by following a path of a glorious bloody revolution that leads us all doomed to a Millennium of tyranny. [until now] The goal has always been a peaceful rebellion
    The Courts must fix it and under respondeat superior punish those who perverted the form
I believe THAT: it''s unconscionable
to expose this abomination, without having a solution of Hope
Possibly there are a few rare occasions on which the goal would be so important as to outweigh the price, which a challenge to the rule of law extracts from a community.  The argument is probably strongest where one refuses to do what he believes is a direct moral wrong to others.
Archibald Cox.
I ask: Can any subordinate to a tyrant defend that its courts can enslave the people of the most peace loving nations on earth?

I hold a dream THAT: People will see the solution as evolution as opposed to revolution, which comes in the form of a NOTION
that is so simple and pure, as to be transparent with truth. 

It's as simple as perfecting an almost perfect Charter of Rights and adhering to a literal interpretation of the common rule of law,
while striving for the ideal that as a species we must redefine progress, in order to achieve the promise of manifesting destiny of achieving our Golden Age with logic and words,

WITH LITTLE MORE THAN PEACEFUL CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE
Ideally, reform would come according to reason and justice without self-help and disturbing, almost violent, forms of protest
- Achibald Cox ,

...