APPENDIX 1: The consequences of converting
the trust to uphold the Supremacy of God's rule of law

I am pressing the Truth that since 1993, when the BAR abandoned the principle of upholding the Sovereign's interests, from their Oath of allegiance, by converting the trust of the commonwealth, by swearing to uphold a new the rule of law,
under The new BARRISTER'S AND SOLICITOR'S OATH

1. That society suffers from the consequences of being governed by a flawed archetypal form, - Which occurred by converting the trust of upholding the rule of law of Canada, in order to fraudulently uphold a new interpretation of respondeat superior as our Supreme rule of law, thus - Creating form that manifested into the abandonment of our principles of fundamental Justice, (natural law)
   By ignoring that: No one can serve two Masters,
   the BAR FAILED AS AN ENTITY TO COMPLY by following a flawed archetypal form, thus creating form where Judges must commit criminal breach of trust, s-336 CCC, by holding the Oath to the BAR Supreme over the Oath of Office,
   
   Which resulted in abandoned the founding principle of Canada: which upholds that

Canada is a Nation founded on recognizing
the principle of the Supremacy of God and the rule of law,   

2. In so doing, the collective Entity of the BAR totally violated the commonwealth's guarantee to never again encroach on the rights of the people, by casting this freedom as Territorial, in section 8 CCC
   
1. These values were caste into form in the 17th century, for the purpose of maintaining order under 'the principle of consent of the governed', which was expanded during the mid -19th century, and caste into our Constitution, in order to guarantee that we would never again return to where anyone could be converted into being tangible property, in order to preclude ever seeing the return of slavery, by casting fundamental individuals (straw man) rights into form, to create order, under the principles of fundamental Justice in a Free and Democratic society
   
2. To quote our Charter: The Meaning and Scope of the Principles of Fundamental Justice “These principles arising from the common law consist of a body of rules, which are termed rules of natural justice. They signify an attachment to fundamental values of the legal system known as the common law”

3. Canada, like most Nations, has always operated like a business
   
   that administrates government employees and services, under the rule of law of commerce, which is called: respondeat superior,
1. Which is defined in our Dictionary of Canadian Law (DCL) as: A highly textured expression, importing many things… but conveying, for example, a sense of orderliness, of subjection to known legal rules and of executive accountability to legal authority
1. Note that this rule of law definition is upheld under OC
   (Orders in Council since 1980)
2. This rule of law has no effect over the people, unless you accept a convoluted argument that our SIN # converts all its citizens into wards and/or employees of the government.

4. Canada has always been next to the USA, which is a Nation that was founded to defend and uphold another definition of the rule of law, (which is defined in Black's Legal Dictionary)

1) A substantive legal principle <under the rule of law known as respondeat superior,   the employer is answerable for all wrongs of an employee in the course of the employment>
2) The supremacy of regular as opposed to arbitrary power 
<citizens must respect the rule of law>

1. The rule of law of commerce, is the opposite of all being equal before and under the law. The Bill of Rights and case law preserves a balance between equity and liberty

3) The common law of England was the law in Canada until 1954, and preserved in Sec 8 CCC In Democracy, the rule of law of commerce cannot rule the people, under the rubric that this archetypal form converts the trust of authority from serving the people, to being rulers.

This age-old conflict, is as old as the concept of Democracy itself, and the solution was caste into a rubric called: colore officii
'the colour of Office', which basically upholds

1. That governors simply don't have the luxury of making black and white decisions,
2. Therefore the colour of the decision must be based on the mindset (mens rea) of promoting the greater good under this maxim:by the people for the people”

4. The entire concept for founding Canada as a Nation is to uphold that Her Sovereign's loyal Subjects would be guaranteed to always be ruled under our Commonwealth rule of law as Supreme

RULE OF LAW  - A fundamental principle of our Constitution,
must mean at least two things. 
First, that the law is Supreme over officials of the government as well as private individuals, and thereby preclusive of the influence of arbitrary power. 
Second, the rule of law requires creation and maintenance of an actual order of positive laws, which preserves and embodies the more general principle of normative order. 
(3rd) Law and order are indispensable elements of civilized life

Canada's Constitutional rule of law and the principles of fundamental Justice were caste together into form, before Canada became a Nation, in order to preserve fundamental commonwealth values,
1. Our rule of law and individual rights were caste as Territorial rights under section 8 CCC, in order to preclude authority from even .'encroaching' on these fundamental rights and freedoms

s-8 (2) protects English law and tradition of having to defend individual fundamental rights, and

“The key aspect to this section is s. 8 (3), which retains all common law defences, excuses and justifications. - Recently, s- 7 of the Charter has been used to interpret the scope of these defences” By casting these rights as a Territory means that the people's freedom is proprietary, therefore

No AUTHORITY can encroach on Section - 8 freedoms without press 'express consent of the governed'

5. I hold as irrefutable that:  The entire ENTITY of the BAR has perverted the rubric of the BAR,
   
6. By violating the very foundation of Locke's theory that: the laws themselves must not violate the "natural rights" of individuals that exist by the "law of Na­ture."    This law of nature is understood to transcend human society and to exist independently of the positive law of any given state.
   
   This violation will not stop until the BAR returns to uphold the Oath of allegiance and when Police Chiefs across Canada own up to serve the people by swearing an Oath of allegiance,
   In order to uphold that:
   Law and order are indispensable elements of civilized life