 APPENDIX
1:
The consequences of converting
the trust to uphold the Supremacy of God's rule of law
I am pressing
the Truth that since 1993, when the BAR abandoned the
principle of upholding the Sovereign's interests, from their Oath
of allegiance, by converting the trust of the commonwealth, by
swearing to uphold a new the rule of law,
under The new BARRISTER'S AND SOLICITOR'S OATH
- That society suffers
from the consequences of being governed by a flawed archetypal
form, - Which occurred by converting the trust of upholding
the rule of law of Canada, in order to fraudulently uphold
a new interpretation of respondeat superior as our Supreme
rule of law, thus - Creating form that manifested into the
abandonment of our principles of fundamental Justice, (natural
law)
By ignoring that: No one can serve two Masters,
the BAR FAILED AS AN ENTITY TO COMPLY by following a flawed
archetypal form, thus creating form where Judges must commit
criminal breach of trust, s-336 CCC, by holding the Oath to
the BAR Supreme over the Oath of Office,
Which resulted in abandoned the founding principle
of Canada: which upholds that
Canada is a Nation founded on recognizing the principle of the
Supremacy of God and the rule of law,
In
so doing, the collective Entity of the BAR totally violated the
commonwealth's guarantee to never again encroach on the rights
of the people, by casting this freedom as Territorial, in section
8 CCC
These values were caste into form in the 17th century,
for the purpose of maintaining order under 'the principle of consent
of the governed',
by John Locke, which was expanded during the mid -19th century,
& caste into our Constitution, in order to guarantee that
we would never again return to where anyone could be converted
into being tangible property, in order to preclude ever seeing
the return of slavery, by casting fundamental individuals (straw
man) rights into form, to create order, under the principles of
fundamental Justice,
which is protected in the Charter under Sec-1:
in a Free and
Democratic society
Canada, like most Nations, has always operated like a business
that administrates government employees and services,
under the rule of law of commerce, which is called: respondeat
superior,
Which is defined
in our Dictionary of Canadian Law (DCL) as:
A
highly textured expression, importing many things … but
conveying, for example, a sense of orderliness, of subjection
to known legal rules and of executive accountability to legal
authority -
Note
that this rule of law definition is upheld under OC
- AND it's used to only protect the illusion of good governance
(Orders in Council since 1980)This
rule of law has no effect over the people, unless you accept a
convoluted argument that our SIN # converts all its citizens into
wards and/or employees of the government.
 Canada
has always been next to the USA, which is a Nation that was founded
to defend and uphold another definition of the rule of law, (which
is defined in Black's Legal Dictionary) 1)
A substantive legal principle <under the rule of law known
as respondeat superior, the employer is answerable for
all wrongs of an employee in the course of the employment>
2)
The supremacy of regular as opposed to arbitrary power
<citizens must obey the law> [it used to say respect the
rule of law]
The rule of law of commerce,
is the opposite of all being equal before under the law. The Bill
of Rights is supposed to preserve a balance with liberty
 3)
The common law of England was the law in Canada until 1954,
when we created a BILL of RIGHTS which preserved in Sec 8 CCC
Constitutionally, the rule of law of commerce cannot rule the
people, under the rubric that this archetypal form converts the
trust of authority from serving the people, to being rulers. EXCEPT
we have a written Constitution to BAR this from happening
This age-old conflict,
is as old as the concept of Democracy itself, and the solution
was caste into a rubric called: colore officii 'the colour of
Office', which basically upholds That
governors simply don't have the luxury of making black and white
decisions, Therefore the colour of the decision must be based
on the mindset (mens rea) of promoting the greater good under
this maxim:by the people for the people”The
entire concept for founding Canada is to uphold that Her Sovereign's
loyal Subjects would be guaranteed to always be ruled under our
Commonwealth rule of law as Supreme
 RULE
OF LAW - A fundamental principle of our Constitution,
must mean at least two things. First, that
the law is Supreme over officials of the government as well as
private individuals, and thereby preclusive of the influence of
arbitrary power. Second, the rule of law
requires creation and maintenance of an actual order of positive
laws, which preserves and embodies the more general principle
of normative order.
(3rd) Law and order are indispensable elements
of civilized life
 Canada's
Constitutional rule of law and the principles of fundamental Justice
were caste together into form, before Canada became a Nation,
in order to preserve fundamental commonwealth values,
Our rule of
law and individual rights were caste as Territorial rights under
Section 8 CCC, in order to preclude authority from even
.'encroaching' on these fundamental rights and freedoms Sec -8
(2) protects English law and tradition of having to defend individual
fundamental rights, and
“The
key aspect to this section is s. 8 (3), which retains all common
law defenses, excuses and justifications. - Recently, s- 7 of
the Charter has been used to interpret the scope of these defenses”
By casting these rights as a Territory means that the people's
freedom is proprietary, therefore
No AUTHORITY can encroach on Section
- 8 freedoms without 'express consent of the governed'
I hold as irrefutable
that: The entire ENTITY of the BAR has
perverted the rubric of the BAR, on the solid ground
that no citizen would ever consent to become slaves to BANKSTERS
without a fight
By
violating the very foundation of Locke's theory that:
the laws themselves must not violate the "natural rights"
of individuals that exist by the "law of Nature."
This law of nature is understood to transcend human society &
to exist independently of the positive law of any given state.
- This violation
will not stop until the BAR returns to uphold the Oath of allegiance
& when Police Chiefs across Canada own up to serve the people
by swearing an Oath of allegiance,
In order to
uphold that:
Law & order are indispensable elements of civilized life
|