-This page outlines what I filed at my last BC trial in June of 2009 - AND edited in July 2010
_____________________________________________________________________________
PREAMBLE This article is about Sec 33 of the Charter
- the NOTWITHSTANDING CLAUSE
- Back in 1982 very few
if anyone was aware or looking for Masonic /Illuminate symbols.

Line-3 of Sec 33 specifically is where all power to subvert Democracy and this 33.3 symbol is simply too glaring an example of Masonic /Illuninate presence and influence for today's conspiracy students - This clause raped every Dempocratic right known to man in Canada in less than 20 years. The damage it's done to the inalienable rights of man is unconscionable.

Canada has never not been ruled by a Masons since it's inception
By Masonic intent,
we are fulfilling the 2nd Commandment - where the sins
of the Fathers are being pressed on the 3rd and 4th generation

- John A MacDonald was a 33rd degree Illuminate Mason
- Then it was Wifred Laurier who was a Cecil Rhodes Mason
____________________________________________________________

POWER CORRUPTS - ABSOLUTE POWER CORRUPTS ABSOLUTELY

Canada is unique in the world: our politicians stole all our rights in 1982 ,
This happened in Meech Lake Accord when behind closed doors our politicians patriated /pirated our Constitution, by saying that they did not want to be part of Canada if they couldn't give themselves this perverted power
No other Country in the Free world has an 'express right' to take away fundamental Freedom from it's citizen's.
Politicians took it. or gave themselves the right to encroach on everyone of our fundamental Freedoms,

The last rights left in Our Charter of Freedom is our political guarantee to protest,
[Sec 3 of the Charter]
& Constitutionally this extends to protecting beliefs
that are contrary to the Official policy of the majority in power.
This is enshrined in Sec 1 of the Charter as 'PRESCRIBED BY LAW'
as Essential Elements in upholding a 'Free and Democratic Society'
under this unconstitutional Parliamentary Supremacy; It says political activity is the only way left in law to fight bad laws and pervert AUTHORITY desires to take it away, after all what I'm doing interferes with their good governance
_________________________________________________________________

Wikipedia defined The Notwithstanding clause as
Section 33 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is part of the Constitution of Canada. It allows Parliament or provincial legislatures to override certain portions of the Charter.
- The Notwithstanding Clause reflects the hybrid character of Canadian political institutions
.
In effect it protects the British tradition of parliamentary supremacy under the American-style
system of written constitutional rights and strong courts introduced in 1982.
[1] The argument has been made that if all fundamental rights can be suspended or encroached
By the notwithstanding clause that it would destroy all individual Freedoms under an excuse of preserving the greater good

_______________________________________________________________________________

NOTE: I add my commentary in brackets [...] the rest is CBC bullshit /spin
- To get the Official [white-washed] line go to: CBC News Online

Jan. 25, 2005 wrote this on the Notwithstanding clause - FAQs
[CANADA IS UNIQUE IN THE WORLD]:

Many national bills of rights do not allow any exceptions.

For example, the first 10 amendments to the U.S. Constitution (commonly referred to as the Bill of Rights) expressly guarantee that "Congress shall make no law" that restricts freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, or a host of other rights. No exceptions are allowed.
Canada's Charter of Rights on the other hand, includes an out.
The notwithstanding clause (sometimes called the "override clause")
is laid out in section 33 of the Charter.
- There was legislative precedent for an override clause in Canada. The Canadian Bill of Rights and human rights codes in Alberta, Saskatchewan and Quebec all have or had provisions that allow for overrides. [those policies are in the 1931 Colonial Act
and are totally unconstitutional after we patriated our Constitution.
But who cares about that?
]

What does the notwithstanding clause do?
The notwithstanding clause allows the federal government or a provincial legislature to enact legislation to override several sections of the Charter that deal with fundamental freedoms, legal rihts and equality rights.

[As to this 2005 report: ALL OF THESE RIGHTS CAN & have NOW BE ABUSED /ENCROACHED]

These include freedom of expression, [Sec 7 Charter] freedom of assembly [Sec 2 Charter], and freedom from unreasonable search and seizure,
[Sec 8 Charter] to name a few.
But a number of other Charter rights cannot be overridden.
These include democratic rights, mobility rights, and the equality of men and women. [all the other exceptions are already taken away by court rulings and legislation since 1982 when it went into affect]
[SINCE this article all of the remaining rights have been raped]

AND [my legal case is all about taking political rights away]
[Which is the only right left and guaranteed under Sec 1 Of the Charter. But who cares?]


Simply put, this override power allows governments to create laws that will operate in spite of (or "notwithstanding") some Charter rights that the laws appear to violate.This override power is temporary. Any notwithstanding clause declaration expires after five years, but can be re-enacted indefinitely.
[They are never renewed they are improved by slapping one Order
in Council on top of the other indefinitely]



[CBC asks] How many times has it been used…and by whom?
Most people think the notwithstanding clause has been used only once.
But it has been invoked more than 15 times [technically it's not a lie].

It's been very quiet on the notwithstanding front since then.
[That's because they agree to uphold a publication ban] - Override powers
are controversial tools & politicians have shied away from using them,
The same-sex marriage debate has served to reignite the debate anew.

NOTE: The CBC does not challenge these numbers from its own government [that would get them fired]
IN FACT: There are literally tens of thousands of them being used all the time. Government(s) have abused it so much that it's safe to say Democracy itself is dead
and
- it's all done to accomodate a true pervertion in law called:
the Sunset Provisions of The Bank Act of 1985

- which is so uncontitutional as to Constitute TREACHERY against Brian Mulroney who most definitely perverted the law thru LEXICOGRAPHY, which is directly prohibited in all solemn oath taken by everyone on the BAR [which is] to never pervert the law
[which they now do all the time, by perverting the definition of words]

AND to show their appreciation PARLIAMENT gave Brian Mulroney
the Order of Canada
, - exactly 18 years later, after the statute of limitation ran out on prosecution him for these crimes of State



Now the big excuse these perverts use to rape everyone of all rights is called "The Supremacy of Parliament
"
but what they fail to tell you is there are 2 very conflicting definitions for this phrase, and [imagine that] constitutionally they're not just using but abusing the one they are not supposed to be upholding
There's all kinds of good articles written by experts in the field on this
very issue, & frankly all of them are crying foul
-
Like this one written by:
The Center for Constitutional Studies or Like this one: Supremacy of Parliament: the British Parliamentary System
Like this one
[which I consider one of the best on the subject]
Supremacy of Parliament and
the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

IN FACT it's virtually impossible to find any Contitutional expert who will defend its abuse.



The notion of the SUPREMACY OF PARLIAMENT is being TOTALLY perverted by BC elected Legislature
.
- IN 2005 BC created out of thin air, a Legislature [by decree not legislation] THAT gave all their power to a foreign body called Parliament, which is nothing but a shadow government of itself - BC perverted the entire Legislative process with BILL 1 Act of Supremacy of Parliament

- BC now has some 'body called <Parliament> and it's the Supreme Authority over the Elected Members of our Legislature, and by decree [not legislation] gave all its power to the Standing Finance Committee of a shadow governing body called <Parliament>

- Parliament of what or where? [I don't know]
But it's above our elected
Legislature AND it defininetly is not the Parliament of Canada

Legally we must call this CORPs God - because
the only body that can be above the Elected Legislature is God


- The likes of: Gord Campbell and Wally Oppal ARE NOT GOD
power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely
Even [or is it especially] when it's a total fictitious creation of an evil mind