I went to trial at 222 Main St. on Wednesday on Feb 4th [the 2 day trial lasted till the end of August]

Click here to see a new video on this court date
Click Here to read my Sec 11-D Charter Challenge file on March 2
Prior to going to court I filed this barage of paperwork at 3 Mayors
Click here to read my 4 letters to 3 Mayors. These letters are critical in triggering tribulation, and entered into court record - Prior to that I was in NWDC [jail in Tacoma]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Crown chewed up the whole 1st day, and now we go back to court on
April 7th @ 222 Main St, when it's my turn [because the Crown has rested its case]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
These following doc were entered into court record on April 1st and filed with every one - the Mayors, Judges & the Sherriffs

[it was also filed with the press, who even after it's show them that there are no publication bans refuse to print - They really are the biggest perverts]

Click Here to read my Writ of Mandamus
Click Here to read the Appendix to my Sec 11-D Charter Challenged.
Click Here to read my report on my Alberta charges,
with a final notice to the Mayors, Judges ans Sheriffs
Click Here to read /download the pamphlet layout of actual doc. file of the above

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

- I, then files my original DENIAL OF CONSENT TO BE GOVERNED
filed on Nov 4th, 2004, on file # 157479 -1, which is the very first charge on file that was dropped
- AND my original hyperiflation indexed Claim for Damages filed on Nov 20th
I also filed the Affidavit filed in my New Westminster PETITION filed on Sept 19th

AND I FILED THIS ABOVE SET OF DOCUMENTS WITH THIS LETTER ATTACHED:
_____________________________________________________________________________

- OUTLINING THE LIABILITY CONTAINED IN MY ORIGINAL FILE # 157479-1
- Filed with the Mayor of Vancouver the Sheriffs and the Judge on April 6th

This file # 157479-1 is very important to a tribunal especially, because everything started with this file, and the Crown dropped it [because it contained too much liability]
-           The reason they dropped it is because they had no case to proceed due to the criminal liability created at and especially between my arraignment hearings.
-           The following detailed explanation outlines the liability created. 
- BECAUSE THIS FILE WAS DROPPED MAKES IT REALLY IMPORTANT TO A TRIBUNAL, BECAUSE IT MAKES IT THEIR DECISION A DEFAULT JUDGMENT

Big events started at the 1st arraignment, when the charges were read to me
1]  On Nov 9th session, they read the charges to me, and I pointed out:· that
-           the first set of charges were against Joseph Marc Pierre BOYER- 2 counts; ·
-           the second set of charges were against Marc Pierre Joseph BOYER - 2 counts;·
-           the last set of charges were against Joseph BOYER- 2 counts. 
- I asked who was being charged? One person or 3 entities, consecutively on concurrently.
-                       The Judge said all charges were against one entity.  Then why all the identities?
-           THIS IS IMPORTANT BECAUSE THEY HAVE NO RIGHT TO RE-CREATE ANY
-           LEGAL FICTIONS OF ME, BECAUSE OF MY SCREWED UP BIRTH STATEMENT

2]  I then brought the fact that Appendix 'B' (line-5-6), identified me as 'MARC BOYER' and
'that the commercial premise known as the Vancouver East Marijuana Party Compassion Club'
 -  [as 1-entity], committed the offense, so it was at best ambiguous, so I wanted clarification.

2- A] I asked that before I was to answer to these charges, I wanted to know the definition of 'premise' on the warrant and the appendixes. They did not understand; so I pointed out that in the Canadian Law Dictionary that premise(s) was first, in law- 'a thought' and second as a building or structure. · Judge Warren stated that there is no such thing as a 'crime of thought',

2- B]  I thanked her for acknowledging the obvious, and noted that if I did not challenge this definition now the Crown could use any definition they wanted, after entering a plea, so it was very important. · I pointed out that as far as I could see they were in fact investigating, and charging the thoughts of a political party·- The Judge asked the Crown to explain the definition. ·
-           The Crown stood and said "I don't understand."
·The Judge got very upset at this answer, because in legalese this means not 'standing under'. --            He doesn't want to answer [stand-under] the question.

2- C]  I, then demanded "under full commercial protest to return my property".
-           The Judge again got very upset and TOLD the Crown to get me out of her court.
-           I was told to put my demand for damages in writing.    At this point, the Crown handed
-           my 'Confirmation of Denial of Consent to be Governed' to the Judge.

2- D] I asked for the doc to be read into the record. The Judge refused and ordered a psychiatric evaluation on me before it would be read into court documentation. I objected, saying that I already had a psych-test done on Jan 7th, and that should be enough. The Crown denied, then reluctantly acknowledged this fact and said I passed a 4-hour psych test at that time.
-           I forced him to acknowledge that Doctor Purcell ruled "no threat to society or himself". The Judge told me that there was no way she would read this doc into court record without a new test, so I agreed to another test. I was told to get this bond before leaving and it was scheduled for the next day.

2- E]  When, I got to the JP, he gave me the copy to sign, and I objected to the name on the undertaking and that all these provisions for a 10-30-day evaluation were added without my consent. So I signed the doc "under duress" to invalidate it.

3] The next day, (I'll save you the details), but 2 officers of VPD broke my chest plate with a round house karate kick, inside the Archdiocese of the Roman Catholic Cathedral, while seeking religious asylum, and while being held in a karadid hold. The VPD are corrupt there's no witnesses to my assault but I do have proof of the assault. There is a 1/16th inch thick slick of Badge #1331's boot imprint from the kick, and X-rays to prove a broken chest plate.

4]  This was VPD’s 2nd attempted murder.  The first time was inside City Hall - Building Department, on Jan. 7th, 2004.   I informed the courts, of my assault encounter with the police, and nothing happened but to postpone the court for another day, to get a mental evaluation that came without conditions attached.  
-           The Forensic mental evaluation was another 4 hr session and again I was shown to be sane and this time they added the term eccentric. It states: 'I can communicate with counsel'.

DUE TO THE LIABILITY IN THIS FILE, THE CROWN’S SOLUTION WAS TO DROP MY 1st SET OF CHARGES, AND CHARGE ME UNDER DOUBLE JEOPARDY IN FILE # 157479-2

5] I returned to court on Jan 5th.     This session was with the lawyer of the co-accused. This lawyer does all the talking; he wants and gets a court date, because I was delaying the proceedings, and the Crown agrees so they set a date to trial – over my repeated objections.

6] Because this lawyer was connected to the case thru a co-accused, the Crown had a way to have a lawyer act as an interferer at the next sessions, and this went all the way to the trial when the Judge dismissed the charges against the co-accused, for lack of evidence. 

7] THERE WAS OBVIOUSLY A PROBLEM WITH PROCEEDING, WITH FILE # 157479-1,
So they opened a 2nd file #157479-2, which is an open and shut case of double jeopardy, AND there had to be a big problem with proceeding with this new file, because the judge wrote a REASONS FOR JUDGMENT after my Confirmation hearing, and 2 weeks before my trial.

8] THE PRIMARY REASON FOR FILING THIS FIRST FILE IS TO POINT OUT THE TOTAL CRIMINALITY OF EVERYONE, and what they were all hiding is attempted murder, by VPD, slavery by the Crown for prosecuting me, and treason by the Attorney General of Canada, for insisting that a member of the Loyal opposing party to be found guilty for protecting our party’s Constitutional right to protect Supreme Court decisions that made cannabis illegal.
 
9] Now if no body thinks there is any liability in my case and think they can just shuffle this mess into oblivion by simply ignoring it means they are totally void of having a conscience.  To not act means the Mayor the Sheriffs and the Judge become an accomplice to attempted murder slave masters and accomplices to treason.  

10]  As I keep repeating, it’s not my choice what any of these perverts do, but am I guilty for trying to take down a perverted system where everyone in it is boun to a perverted oath and reject any will to show a conscience?

Loveisarose

marc boyer
free man on the land