- APPENDIX TO EXPRESS GREATER DETAILS ON MY SEC 11-D CHALLENGE

PREAMBLE:             My original submission to the Judge was based on pressing the ground motives [or reasons for] that lie festering behind my Sec 11-D challenge, and these ground motives are the basis for the 3rd reason listed in Martin’s CC on calling for a tribunal.          
NAMELY:        [Martin’s CC] “Generally speaking, where the alleged actions are insulting and insolent, it is preferable that the contempt proceedings be taken before a judge other than the judge to whom the remarks were addressed.”
There is simply nothing more insulting to a Judge than being shown proof that they cannot proceed without first resolving the fact that the Crown, the Judge, and politicians have an ongoing history of conspiring to hand me what can only be called ‘rigged trials’
.                      
The charge of rigging a trial of a member of the Loyal opposition, who is defending the party rubric [to my knowledge] is a STATE CRIME & falls under the authority of several Acts like
The 1998 Police Act, and it’s called FAILURE OF AN ENTITY TO COMPLY
And the remedy in all portfolios lies exclusively in the power vested in a tribunal.

1. The very nature of my insult is so great that every time I start to bring it up with a judge, it has created a scene, where the judge shouts me down, in order to prevent hearing it;

1. and in this way it was not ‘heard’ and it’s not entered into record.

2. When I pressed this ‘insult’ in BC  Supreme Court last Sept, under the Elections Act, in New Westminster Supreme Court Registry, I was obstructed at the registry Office, and denied due process by the Federal Crown’s Office, who flat out broke the law, in order to prevent this insult from going before a Judge.
3. FURTHERMORE: When I took this proof and this obstruction of Justice & tried to cross the U.S. border seeking safe passage to the United Nations Courts THAT:

1. Their Homeland Security Forces refused to let me face a Judge, and in so doing violated prohibited practices, and international treaties, by imposing slavery on a freeman by unlawfully holding me for ten weeks, and
1. All of this was done to bar me from telling a judge this insult.

2. So in order to bar the judge from shouting me down, I did not list the obvious violation of the 1st reason in my opening outline; in this way the judge may bring up the matter;
1. By asking me to site a reason, under the 1st reason for a tribunal,
   she in law ‘asked for’  this insult to be entered into the record

1. NAMELY: [quote – Martin’s CC] Presumption of innocence:

-  As a minimum the right to be presumed innocent is guaranteed by Sec 11-D

2. When she asked for it, I sited [Exhibit-A] Judge Bruce’s Reasons for Judgment, of Nov 16th which was written and tabled 2 weeks before my trial date, therefore

1. It’s impossible to deny that I was found guilty before going to trial;
2. It’s undeniable: some elected Official(s) told the judge to find me guilty

3. The prescribed remedy under Sec 11-D, in my case file, and <<in fairness>> would be to send all my case files to a new trial that is fair and public and under the authority of an independent tribunal because Manifest Destiny as outlined in Romans is being pressed
1. As I see it, the only body that can really deal with my timely and miraculous appearance is a tribunal because the matter being pressed is my claim to be Abraham’s Seed and the deliverer of the new Covenant as outlined in Galatians
2. In form, only a tribunal can rule on my 1st case file [157479-1] because it contains a default judgment that delivers God’s promise of Redemption as told in Rom 13
3. It’s undisputable THAT:           The only authority that vests sufficient power to initiate and undertake the opportunity to fulfill Isaiah 2-through 4 is in a tribunal.

As I see it: The presenting of this insult to the Judge will happen within the first few minutes of this trial, and if the Judge refuses to sent this trial to a tribunal, upon hearing the insult means
I’ll just walk out of another rigged kangaroo-court, and the Sheriffs will do what they do.