celtAs I said in open court in Alberta and Vancouver court:

"It's self evident that the Crown wants to fight, and I want to fight"
- All that really is being decided here is in which jurisdicition"

In order to manifest Destiny it needs to go to a tribunal [period]

Entered into court record on June 20th 2008

- TO PRESS MULTIPLE COUNTS OF LEGAL INSANITY AGAINST THE FEDERAL CROWN   

- INITIAL SET OF DOCUMENTS ENTERED INTO 2 CASE FILES

British Columbia Case file # 193475              [and]          Alberta Case file # 1-19621

Glossary of contents:

1st Appendix:  N/A   Not available [yet] Elections Canada nonfeasance to uphold the rule of law

2nd Appendix: Documentation to prove malfeasance by the provincial / Federal CROWN
                                    In BC case file #157479-C; file #157481-C: and file # 182787

1]    [1-page brief] - PREAMBLE - Presentation of the Charges to call a Tribunal

2]    [2-page brief] - NOTICE OF LIABILITY contained in my Act of Supremacy Challenge

3]    [1-page brief] – Sept 20, 2007 – Introduction letter to a Judge and Crown Council

4]    [1-page brief] – Sept 24, 2007 – Application to Appear before a Judge

5]    [7-page doc] – Oct 5, 2007 – Reasons for Judgment of Judge C.L. Bagnal

6]    [5-page brief] – Petition to Press my Charge to Deliver case file # 182787-C to a Tribunal
                        Which is a point by point detailed argument to Judge Bagnal’s 7-page doc

7]         [3-page doc] – Criminal Convictions [as tabled by Alberta in their case file]
Which show proof of my claim at my Show Cause Hearing on June 19th
that BC committed FRAUD in presenting its Criminal Convictions

3rd Appendix:      [28-pages] Judge Pitfied’s REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Which in line 158 states “I declare that ss. 4(1) and 5(1) of the CDSA are inconsistent
with Section 7 of the Charter, and of no force and effect]

NOTICE Detailed legal arguments will be made in person at my June 23rd Calgary Pretrial Conference And at my June 26th Vancouver Arraignment Hearing,

Where I will defend that this judgment really does place a moratorium of being able to expect immunity under <<the inter jurisdictional immunity doctrine>>, when this Judge challenges its very validity, when applied to medical needs of any and all of ss. 4 and ss. 5 of the CDSA

4th Appendix:              
Documentation entered into Vancouver registries and e-mailed into Alberta authorities
                - To be entered into court record in person at Calgary authorities on Monday

1]         [4-page brief] – Report on my June 3rd appearance [and legal argument to be pressed on June 23rd]
2]         [2-page brief] – June 2, 2008 - AFFIDAVIT entered into court file # 1-19621

3]         [2-page brief] – June 2, 2008 – On Outlining my Identity Issue from another mindset

NOTICE          This brief is being presented to express my Sec 337 CCC Demand to forward my file to
an appropriate authority that can hold the matter, under Sec 11 D of the Charter
In order to deliver a Sec 15 Charter recognition of a valid CLAIM OF RIGHT under Sec 39 CCC

5th Appendix:  Documentation forwarded to the Attorney General and Gov. of California

1]         [3-page brief] – Summary and report on my activism
2]         [1-page brief] – Brief preface

NOTICE         
This offer is being pressed to deliver 2 or 3 witnesses [in this inter jurisdiction immunity web]
In order to stand under that nonfeasance means compliance, as outlined in Hebrews 10:28

  • This is being expressed to deliver a global nature to this initiative.
  • You can run but you cannot hide; the smell of the spirit of death surrounds you [Rom 7]