I almost made it to court Jan 11th 2:pm
as a rule bail variations are dealt in room 100, but for some reason they think I need to be on the penthouse for this date in Room 513
- When I got there the Crown /Sheriffs would not let me in
This motion is a simple BAIL VARIANCE APPLICATION
so that a 'no-go' can be removed, so that I can file my Act of Supremacy Charter Challenge.in Supreme Court
- I can't be in or anywhere near the Vancouver Supreme Court district, therefore to file I need to go with a lawyer

As I said to the Crown: I have tried to find a lawyer &
as to prophecy not one will take the case [on my terms]
- which is explained in the document /Affidavit below
The Crown Attorney said that he knew a lawyer who would take it.
- So, I went to this trial lawyers' office, filed a written submission to him as to his request, and so far they don't return calls
FURTHERMORE:He said that because of the nature of the matter,
-the Crown would reject any bail variance in their criminal behavior because it needed to be heard in civil action in Supreme Court

- Because of the 'no-go' he advised me to file in New West minister, and in order to expedite this undertaking, he promised that he would give me a letter, as a compromise for refusing /BARing me entry into the court room.

When I tried to get this letter, I was told that his boss told him he could not give me this letter, because it jeopardized their case.

So, as i pointed out to that Attorney General Wally Oppal is a pervert of the law, and he said he could not argue the point.

Frankly, [denial is more than a river in Africa]it's all just another stall tactic
As I said to the Crown: I don't care if they fear this day, I cannot shrink from pursuing it
The prophecy in Romans says that my efforts come down to an event where "until the last day they will be in stupor"
- This prophecy is most definitely a two edged sword.
- I am pursuing 'a yes' or 'no' answer - a 'no' means the last day to file was rejected on the testimony of 2 or 3 witnesses, and 'any variation of yes' triggers an Act of Supremacy Charter Challenge, and we live in interesting times
- which is an old Chinese curse = tribulations

There is simply no one not even an angel that knows what Jacob will decide in that day
- it all comes down to who do they love? - the offer is simple: surrender to love

As far as I see it:
I'm pursuing a path to go from Isaiah 4 and jump all the way to 40
in order to avoid the horror of everything in between - If Jacob does not care to take this leap then they impale themselves & everyone with all these curses in between 4 and 40: [there's enough of them to destroy themselves a few times]
DIRE WARNING: All I do is read across several books of our end times for direction and advice, and in so doing literally hundreds of prophecies are being fulfilled.
It alarms me that there are all sorts of international and especially personal events /markers that are happening simultaneously to indicate that many will be choosing the hell-hole route.

HEBREWS 10: [15] The Holy Spirit also testifies to us about this. First he says
This is the covenant I will make with them at that time,
says the Lord, I will put my laws in their hearts, and I will write them on their minds. -[17] then he adds:
Their sins and lawless acts I will remember no more and when these have been forgiven, sacrifice for sin will no longer be necessary

[26] If we keep on sinning after we have received the knowledge of the truth, no sacrifices for sin are left, but the fearful expectation of judgment and [27] of a raging fire that will consume the enemies of God [28] Anyone who rejects the law of Moses died without mercy on the testimony of two or three witnesses NAMELY:
- Don't ever make bonded servants [slaves] out of your own people...

I must emphasis that we are at the beginning of tribulations good
or tribulations bad. It's not my choice...
Either way, we will all see each other in Paradise real soon...

In response to providing clarity to an opportunity to manifest our Destiny
If you bow to de-facto governments it's not only your knees that will be sore

- [For the word document click here] - AFFIDAVIT

- A 3 - PAGE BRIEF OUTLINING MY CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE AND DIRECT ACTION!

1 - I came back to Canada in 2000 after being away for 16 years. 
I’ve been, in Authority’s face hammering 'the system' for over 4 years now, with just Freedom of Expression and on 4:20/04 is when I first filed in Supreme Court this notion of  'upholding Creation' on an entirely secular argument. 

2 - In fact I stuck to a secular approach till my Sept 28th/06 court date. 
This is when I also slammed them with my fraudulent birth statement and the Crown ‘stayed’ the proceeding and have dodged every attempt to find remedy to my identity issue, [when their oaths of Office demand direct action under called Sec 336 - Criminal Breach of Trust] 

3 - At this 4:20/04 Supreme Court motion I filed a Petition against [the-then] new Chief Constable Graham for his bond and on the weight of the particulars [sworn statements of police] I charged him with RAPE.  The Judge objected to the word rape because it ‘no longer’ applied to these circumstances. So I asked what word did apply, and he had no answer. – [no reply]
-3-years later [with my last charges] there's a brand new Chief and he's upholding a police state
a -  I then argued that under Sec 8.2 old English law can be used in especially civil court, and that there were literally hundreds of such cases on their files and [other than Louis Riel and Duplesse] there is no case law here. -  I charged that he had vanquished my territory, plundered my bounty, and raped me of my law right to descent -  Under the Elections Act, our HEADquarters are not in the jurisdiction of the Corp. of Vancouver or the Chief,
b - It’s there for this very reason of BARring local police from especially federal politics, and the charge here is that the Chief stepped outside his jurisdiction when his warrant charged THAT    
" the commercial ‘premise’ known as the Vancouver East Marijuana Party Compassion Club, at 44 Kingsway, actively sold marihuana." The Crown refused to define the word premise at my arraignment, and the Judge agreed that there was no such thing as a crime of thought and as written, the warrant could be read as "the commercial thought of a federal party" 
c -  It took 3 hearings to get Chief Justice Brenner [in less than 2 weeks] to rule that my Petition needed to be forwarded to Appeals Court, where I was invited to file, and agree to disagree  [therefore beg] for the return of God given rights that were taken away from us.  I charged that I was a victim an ‘erroneous claim of right’ under Part-9 of the 1998 Police Act.
d -  Back then the Judge defended that ‘Civilian Oversight’ [Part 9] was just a white paper, & dismissed this motion.But 3 years later it’s now a charge of upholding a de facto government, because Part-9 is now in full force & effect. [under this never before enforced Constitutional law]
e - Back then I pointed out that I wanted to proceed an appeal through a 'Writ of Mandamus' which was removed from the form in 1998, and this had everything to do with this highway robbery of jurisdictional power that ‘Constituted’ a police state coup d’Etat .
f -   Without the Writ of Mandamus there was no way to proceed without begging the court’s approval first, and -  This means that if anybody and/or anyone needed to defend God Given rights then they must beg for them. = tyranny. 

4 - In this last conviction The entire foundation of the Supremacy of God is undermined when the Judge ruled in writing that any one’s beliefs are irrelevant in a multi cultural society, which fulfills Jesus’ warning in Luke 13 “no one can serve 2 masters, you either serve God or mammon”
a -           When [not if] Judges and /or police are charged with robbery of jurisdictional power to interfere with a claim to defend a God given right means having ‘to agree to disagree’.
[bowing to a de facto government occurs when they force you to ask for a God given right]
- it's occurs so many times they can't see the harm, from omitting the obvious = insanity [Sec 16]
b - A Petition is a requisition to seek remedy [almost begging].
c - I asked this question “Why is it that a Writ of Mandamus was good enough for 700 years, then why could I not use it now?  The result of this question was entering into my record an ‘iron clad’ GAG ORDER [publication ban]

5 - At this first session I made it clear THAT-  I would return to trial in criminal court because I refused to beg for God given rights, At this trial, I did say that I was not standing under the Charter, I was standing under God's rule of law, as Supreme 
- I was found guilty of operating a Marijuana Party store that sold hydroponics equipment and fertilizer in the front and marihuana to members in the back, and prohibited from buying selling or possessing fertilizer and equipment
a -  I pressed criminal charges in Supreme Court against the Judge [sec 336] when she ruled that God's rule of law did not apply to me, and that I was mis'taken' [raped] to believe the Elections Act offered me ‘immunity’, and -  This time I got as far as a Panel in Supreme Court and they ruled that my Petition was not an Appeal and -  I needed to appeal [or beg for God given rights] and agree to disagree with the Judges’ decisions -

6 - These courts keep insisting that I will enter the trap of pay forever in court of Appeals, and as to prophecy in 1 Tim 4  -  I’m defending THAT:
- They are 1st prevented from marrying [which is the core issue of serving 2 masters] and
THAT: i AM BEING CONDEMNED FOR MY THOUGHTS, for believing that Cannabis is a certain food created by God in thanksgiving, and that I live in a society that’s in it's end times, lost in the root of all evil: - love of money = idolatry

7 -  Now, [by the grace of God] on this same case file, she 'handed' her ruling down 3 days ‘after’ the Election Act Writ was dropped, and this meant legal insanity to rule that the Elections Act did not apply, [once the Election Writ is dropped, the law of the land is only under this Act]
a - so back then, before my candidacy was accepted into the next ballot, I filed a caveat with my nomination papers that demanded under sec 336 a written answer from the then CEO of Election Canada to 'what rule of law was Supreme in his Office' in order to go to court with this letter

8 - FURTHERMORE:  I filed a Petition with our new Gov-Gen Michael Jean to charge this judge under sec 336 on Her watch, and reminded her that while the Writ is dropped, she really had a lot more than ceremonial power - Because of the GAG ORDER none of this made press and absolute nobody did anything = TREASON 
As to prophecy in 2-Tim these hypocritical liars have gone from bad to worse
- stuck in a form that is perverted, by a legal fiction created by [Sir] John Solomon, and as to prophecy the men of the Nineveh must repent for following the teachings of Solomon [Luke 11]
a -  A year later [without answering any written demand] Elections Canada demanded that I comply with sending my final consent signature on one last form
- [that releases them from liability of answering my caveat] and
- I pointed out that I paid $1000 to get an answer and that made them in default of a contract, and in response to their threat in their final letter I told them that ‘I waited in patient anticipation of triggering consequences that are contained in the Act that are unavoidable.’             
b - Exactly 21-days later JP Kinsley and the then Chief Justice of Canada resign.  And I'm on record since then of calling this event Jesus' prophecy /warning in Mat 24 of the flight of the elect happening in the dead of winter [Dec 21, 2006]
c - It's now a year after this event, Elections Canada is still refusing to answer the question or discover where my $1000 is hiding and 
- They are inviting me to file in civil court to ask the CEO the question and tell us where my $1000 disappeared.   - I want the $1000 transferred to my new candidacy, when the Writ drops and Elections Canada agrees that I need to go to Supreme Court to do this in a 'civilized society' as the courts and Crown like to call themselves 

9 - Now in the meantime [more detail on the new charges] - In August 07 I deliberately set myself up to get busted again, to enact a hornet’s nest of liability -  I now also have to address in a civil court my disappearing matter issue created in my new charges -  I hold a written ruling, where the Judge does not address the need to seize my property. = insanity 
- It's a ceremonial breach [Sec 336 CCC to send someone to jail, 'without disposing of the matter'
a - This happened because I refused to sign a consent form to have some of any property returned after the bust.  As I asked this Judge at the arraignment "does this court hold the authority to hold let alone seize the property of any federal political party? The answer was 'no'. So I said 'we are the Marijuana Party give us our marijuana back -  As I need to address in court: sending me to jail on a PPT without any matter before the courts is a breach of sec 336

10 - I agree whole heartedly again that I have to file in Civil Court BUT-  Now, this is complicated by the fact that I have another case file, that holds me to a bail undertaking [court order] to not be seen anywhere near the Supreme Court
a - This is sec 810 charge issued by Wally Oppal’s Office our A G – for an event that occurred the same day I got charged on this bust - This was just an act of Civil Disobedience, and I guarantee you, he feels threatened by my political activity [this is the 3rd violation of 'instilling fear' I have a no go of Libby Davies my member of Parliament, [which keep disappearing] and Chief Justice Stanfield's Office [in Jan 07] and now the Attorney's General Office]
- as to prophecy they really do fear 'the one', in fact these people claim to be in terror of me
b - It’s not hard to write a Petition that attaches these files into one case file but I can't file it because of a ‘no go’.  -  I simply can't find a lawyer to solicit a Petition; they all want an Appeal route.  Begging for God is not an option   [Agreeing to disagree is not an option here]
c -  Heb 10 "and if he shrinks I will not be pleased with him'. This line gives me shivers every time I confront it as an option, - But frankly, I asked for this burden “where much is expected by those who surrender to undertake large tasks".It's exactly as to prophecy I ask for help and it's there. I personally think that what I'm doing is not special, any one who asks God's help in upholding Creation will receive generously   [it really is God's armor of love] Kids don't try this at home
d -  If I can't find a lawyer to proceed on a Petition then we are at a stale mate.  I guess they want to die a merciless death on the testimony of 2 or 3 witnesses, because they are insulting God's grace, by insisting that I beg for God given-rights. 
- By starting this process now, everything is in place for my Short Leave Petition being addressed on or around the 70-sevens, which happens to fall around 'Mardi Gras' and this is happening about the same time as the last day I can seek remedy under my Act of Supremacy Challenge [with my damage award attached] that triggers Jubilee there are so may coincidences

11 - I get the impression that they have full intentions of dragging this out for a few centuries thru the Appeal process, the idea of the finality of a Petition is too scary for Jacob to even contemplate. The body of my petition is very straight forward:
a - Send my Act of Supremacy Charter challenge to a tribunal to face the consequences of 2 or 3 witnesses, or be destroyed by a destroying angel [like Xian's statues] for refusing to act on the testimony of 2 or 3 witnessing. [Hebrews 10] and Hope it's limited to 18 to start [Luke 13]
I stand firmly that they deserve all glory if they act righteously or
they die mercilessly thru nonfeasance.  So be it.
   
As I read the accounts of this direct action /challenge to Jacob and Israel:  they can run but they cannot hide