 What
part of REPENT or PERISH don't I get?
I went to court on Nov 8th and I was arrested and thrown in jail
upon passing the court house security
on a breach of of a breach of creating a disturbance at the AG's
Office. - Because of this new breach, I was arrested before walking
into court - I had a warrant for missing a confirmation hearing
[on a breach?] that never existed. They invented a charge
out of the blue
As I told the arresting Sheriff: "I expected to have this
bullshit arrest happen"
- I was booked finger printed then dragged in front of
a JP who said all the proceedings on this breach file were coming
to a halt AND
- we would start all over again with an Arraignment, AND
I would have to spend 4-5 months in jail while awaiting a new
trial. Because I missed this dreamt up date, I need to stay in
jail til then.
At this Monday Kangaroo court session, I got my shots in on about
the abuse of process and that the AG and his courts were
sending a powerful and convincing message that they simply refuse
to repent, and
that the message is clear: they
reject the new Covenant
I made it clear that I needed to clear a few matters & leave
the country
So I told them that i would plead guilty, after talking to a duty
council.
This resulted in getting a 1-hour trial on Friday Nov
12th, where I was handed 1-day sentence for this breach charge
and it was 'time served' because I was in jail for 5 days.
- Had I plead not guilty i would have spent 5-6 months in jail
to hear the same 'one-day - time served sentence'. As I said they
are not worth the effort.
- What I came for and what I got was an answer that they
were perverts of the law to the end and I didn't need to spend
5-6 months in jail to prove it.
The courts proved that I am never going to be entitled to a fair
trial on this charge, or any other charge.
By pleading guilty, - I was denied the right. to bring up my ID
issue in court, OR the fact that they have no business using a
'Special Prosecutor' on a breach: it's insane and a Constitutional
abuse of power. - BUT I couldn't
- because of the guilty plea these perverts can say that
I agreed to the abuse [and that's just the way it is.]
- BUT I was able to address the abuse of process of the
AG's Office and my need to see the AG and the new SG
On court record: I got to file a complaint
that the last AG rigged my trial,
[on file # 157479] and that the real reason I can't see the AG
is because he refuses to face the consequences for rigging my
trial.
The restriction to stay away from all court and government
facilities and any and all employees of the AG's employ means
I can't file any charges against him without breaking the law.
and to add on top of that the restriction that I can't
see the AG without a lawyer meant I could never see the AG because
no lawyer would take my case to charges the AG with a crime.
 These
conditions were there to enforce that every employee of BC had
a duty to protect the AG from being charged for
rigging my trials
By law when an AG rigs the trial of a Federal Officer
of our Party for upholding our constitutional guarantees is by
definition called TREASON.
- The only thing that authority cannot do under the Supremacy
of Parliament is use arbitrary power against the Loyal Opposition
and if they get caught doing that it's called TREASON because
it subverts Democracy itself.
THE FACT IS: The law upholds that no one is above the law
- EXCEPT when the BC AG gets caught at rigging my trial
 All
of these legitimate complaints means the judge is being cornered
into giving me a way to file charges, which they have
effectively done for 3-years now
- By law no one can bar direct [let alone indirect] access
to an AG
AND the Judge disagreed - I have no right to peacefully protest
abuse by Public Officials and because I disagree means i cannot
be graced with such a right
- So I defended that as a bare minimum, I needed a court recognized
right to have an agent file for me who was not on the BAR in order
to serve documents and follow thru with verbal and personal contact
with Officials for me.
|