Click Here to get to read the Original word document [1 page]
Here is an illustrated presentation of this document
_________________________________________
OUTLINE on Democracy and the Supremacy of Parliament

[APPENDIX -1] - 1-page brief
As to this paper written by <The Center for Constitutional Studies> University of Alberta

A] Line one starts with: Democracy is known as “government by the people”.
- This trust is based on an ancient maxim of law called the Colore Officii,
which has been defined by Greek philosophers as “by the people for the people”
BUT: Our enlightened Canadian Parliament ’legislated’ this new definition of Colore Officii [in the DCL before ever seeing it].[DCL= Dictionary of Canadian Law]

Colour of Office: Pretense of authority to carry out an act for which the actor has no such authority - Colore Officii: Latin for colour of office. See DURESS
- Duress: Threats to anothers property, threats of physical violence or economic duress, which includes a contract. See ECONOMY [The really bad contract is NAFTA]
- Economy: The acquisition, at the lowest cost and at the appropriate time, of financial, human and physical - resources in appropriate quantity and quality.
By definition DEMOCRACY now means that we the people serve the banksters who are authorized to loot all our resources & make us slaves

Democracy is dead UNDER THIS NEW WORD ORDER
it's now - BY THE PEOPLE FOR THE ECONOMY UNDER DURESS
My contention is that this is being enforced thru the total abuse of
Sec 15 CCC <OBEDIENCE TO DE-FACTO LAW> and this was done in order to follow the totally abusive policy of the Dicey Doctrine of irish Home Rule
- Which was entrenched by NAFTA thru this perverted Sec 33 of the Charter to impose Martial Law over our courts to trash our Constitutiton
- We are literally being governed under occupation by a foreign body of banksters
under Maritime jurisdiction that desire to rule the world

- Under this new Martial Law under Dicey's Colonial Rule everyone is now defrauded by being charged under the CC [the criminal code of where?]
- In Canada the Constitutionally says we are to be ruled under the CCC which gaurantees equal protection of all our Charter Rights and Freedoms, and the CC hands down equal treatment under the CC in Martial Law courts, where all our rights are suspended because the ECONOMY simply cannot afford us to have rights.
After all If we have real rights how can the ECONOMY compete against all those countries that have none? Our poor economy needs us to be slaves

NOW in order to differentiate between these Martial Law status is reflected in all this case law by being labeled as
“r-v-accused” as opposed to “R-v-accused” [before 1989 which is when our pervert government imposed the Dicey Doctrine on us ]
- AND It becomes self-evident that Martial Law rules when no Judge can or will ever show their Commission Frankly the Judge’s Commission indicts the entire form into being in an ‘Instrument of uncivil war’ against the people under occupation by foreign banksters, and quit your whining it's the law.
We are ruled by law now, because they trashed our right to protection by the rule of law

Now, here is the direct quote of the entire 2nd paragraph : In a parliamentary democracy, - the Parliament is supreme and no other governmental institution has the power to nullify its laws.
- If a citizen finds a certain law repugnant, his only option is to mobilize a change in Parliament (for example, by campaigning in favour of a certain issue or by joining a political party), such that Parliament changes that law. There is nothing a citizen can do against a law that is believed to have violated his rights other than push for political change.
“Strictly speaking, in a country of Supremacy of Parliament, Parliament cannot issue an unconstitutional law since there are no bounds to its authority

B] All Legal experts confirm THAT: our governors pirated our Constitution in order to be rulers under the Supremacy of Parliament,
[as to Appendix 2] THEREFORE: [by definition] Since its inception
BILL 1 of the BC Legislature totally constitutes FRAUD
In BC's case they created an entire shadaow body called Parliament so that no one is liable for the sell-out of all our assets.thru treasonous activity
- IN FACT: As our experts confirm; The Supremacy of PARLIAMENT simply has no limits to its unconstitutionality. It’s bring used as an Instrument to uphold TREACHERY, on the solid ground that it makes the BC Legislature a member of the Finance Committee of PARLIAMENT AND Frankly their own paperwork confirms that IT’S NOT THE PARLIAMENT OF CANADA
- This is undeniable when you examine the fact that there is no such thing as this Finance Committee in Ottawa

NOT WITHSTANDING THE OBVIOUS:
LET’S PLAY BY THE RULES OF THE SUPREMACY OF PARLIAMENT
- Under this totally lawless form, the only way anyone can fight a bad law
is thru political activity at a federal parliamentary level [WHICH IS EXACTLY WHAT I'M DOING] - Under the Supremavcy of parliament the only thing there is any restriction on is that they cannot prosecute or persecute the Loyal Opposion, whcih is exactly what they do all the time with Marijuana Party candidates and Officers. My present situation shows solid proof of TREASON being committed by several BC government Officials and they simply don't care. They are in so deep they can't get out so. It's like cornering a lion - they are bound to snap and which way they go is their Destiny.

[As outlined in Appendix 3] the unrestrictive nature of the notwithstanding clause has totally destroyed every right known to man, [under the CC]: Under this lawless form,[quote] S. 33 does not apply to the whole of the Charter. It’s being used to derogate from [degogate: fancy word for wrip-off] ss. 2 (fundamental freedoms), 7-14 (legal rights) and 15 (equality rights). Sec 33 cannot be applied to the following category of rights: - democratic rights (ss. 3-5)-[the last right left]

It's taken the legal system 20 years to screw the people of all our inalienable rights that God gave us. AND frankly it's perfectly legal under the Dicey Doctrine because the courts simply do not recognise an argument of right and wrong - it's irrelevant - religious beliefs are irrelevant - because case law says so.

Under this totally INSANE policy they actually have several case law rulings that say that if a judge is presented with having to rule between what is plainly the truth and Official policy that Offical policy must be upheld and the Official policy is this perverted color of Office of "By the people for the ECONOMY"
_____________________
All of this Supremacy of Parliament documentation was originally filed with the Lieutenant Governor of BC [back starting in April 2007] and this pervert Native Chief desires to destroy Democracy and make everyone a slave because he hates God
All it got me was a ban from seeing the Attorney General or anyone under his authority which is everyone
Click Here to get one more legal article on THE SUPREMACY OF PARLIAMENT
I didn't quote from it directly this time round but still very informative
Click Here to get to my articles on Sec 33 THE NOT WITHSTANDING CLAUSE
These original arguments were posted in the summer of 2007
- BACK THEN: this paperwork was one of the bricks used to cause the first Solicitor General of BC John less to resign [the day after my confirmation hearing before Judge Rommili